Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Well done Iceland
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by grabri View PostMy point isn't about how painful that it is. It's about parents that mutilate their children in the name of religion.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
It's not mutilation. At least not according to the dictionary. It's a trivial operation.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
I concede that it may be more of a cultural convention than a religious one - doesn't make it right though.
So where would you like to draw the line - male circumcision is OK? female circumcision? branding? facial tattoos?Comment
-
Originally posted by grabri View PostI concede that it may be more of a cultural convention than a religious on - doesn't make it right though.
So where would you like to draw the line - male circumcision is OK? female circumcision? branding? facial tattoos?Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostFemale circumcision causes massive health issues for women and should be entirely eradicated. It is of an entirely different order to male circumcision. As for branding and tattoos - which cultures do this?Comment
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostIt's not mutilation. At least not according to the dictionary. It's a trivial operation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lockhouse View PostIn your opinion. Ask Jews what they want. We're in danger of practising the tyranny of the majority.His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...Comment
-
It's mutilation without individual consent.
When that consent is given, for whatever reason, fine. Otherwise a law to prosecute those that would harm others is logical in my book."Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
Originally posted by scooterscot View PostIt's mutilation without individual consent.
When that consent is given, for whatever reason, fine. Otherwise a law to prosecute those that would harm others is logical in my book.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
Comment