Originally posted by milanbenes
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Who would you ban and why ?
Collapse
X
-
-
WHSOriginally posted by TheFaQQer View PostEveryone who wasn't on the old forum. This place used to be so much better and funnier and wittier in those days, so we should take the forum forwards by going backwards.
If you don't have a login to the YUKU site then you should all be banned.What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
How is your zimmer frame?Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostWHS
If you don't have a login to the YUKU site then you should all be banned.Comment
-
When it concerns Beansey, some leniency is usually shown...Originally posted by eek View PostWarning - asking for someone to be banned is a banning offence
His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...Comment
-
Comment
-
Absolutely not.Originally posted by woohoo View PostI want to ban the RAC, ******* bunch of useless call centre monkeys. Can you get banned for asking for an external third party to be banned?
It is, but saying who you would ban, with reasons, is not calling for a ban. I would ban eek for bombarding mods with ... ahem... "special" requests.Originally posted by eek View PostWarning - asking for someone to be banned is a banning offence
NAT in back from holiday mellow mood.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
hmm Given the thread I last did that on your judgement is a bit lacking or would you prefer to leave posts that encourage a potentially suicidal poster to commit....Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostAbsolutely not.
It is, but saying who you would ban, with reasons, is not calling for a ban. I would ban eek for bombarding mods with ... ahem... "special" requests.
NAT in back from holiday mellow mood.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Comment
-
...er... it was meant tongue in cheek. For the avoidance of doubt, your PMs on various matters are highly appreciated by myself and the other moderators.Originally posted by eek View Posthmm Given the thread I last did that on your judgement is a bit lacking or would you prefer to leave posts that encourage a potentially suicidal poster to commit....Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
We know who you would ban. All usernames in a tombola and the first one picked out.....Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post...er... it was meant tongue in cheek. For the avoidance of doubt, your PMs on various matters are highly appreciated by myself and the other moderators.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment