Originally posted by SueEllen
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Another One
Collapse
X
-
-
Not necessarily, plenty /= most or a majority, just that there is enough to satisfy a need, be it physical or opinion. Both guilty of using a noun where a comparative adjective would be more appropriate.Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostSo if plenty do and plenty don't, it is a false dichotomy.But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the youngerComment
-
Originally posted by Mordac View PostBites the dust.
British ISIS recruiter Sally Jones 'killed' by drone | Daily Mail Online
What a pity it took so long...
“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
-
Plenty defines the number at least >0, so it is a false dichotomy. 'Plenty' in this context is a pronoun, not a noun, and is correct and sufficient to define a false dichotomy.Originally posted by Gibbon View PostNot necessarily, plenty /= most or a majority, just that there is enough to satisfy a need, be it physical or opinion. Both guilty of using a noun where a comparative adjective would be more appropriate.
Regrettably, you are displaying a lack of education. It is a pity nobody took the trouble to teach you some Latin.Comment
-
To be fair, I thought he was doing OK, for an ape...you could maybe chuck him a banana ffs...Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostPlenty defines the number at least >0, so it is a false dichotomy. 'Plenty' in this context is a pronoun, not a noun, and is correct and sufficient to define a false dichotomy.
Regrettably, you are displaying a lack of education. It is a pity nobody took the trouble to teach you some Latin.His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...Comment
-
Show me that proof. Plenty is not a mathematical function. Can you imagine a requirement: 'give the engine plenty of fuel'.Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostPlenty defines the number at least >0, so it is a false dichotomy. 'Plenty' in this context is a pronoun, not a noun, and is correct and sufficient to define a false dichotomy.
Regrettably, you are displaying a lack of education. It is a pity nobody took the trouble to teach you some Latin.
Nice jibe on the Latin, are you published? I am, perhaps we could exchange papers, mine's on Horace odes 3.14.But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the youngerComment
-
You mean like the requirements plenty of us get from business users until we nail them down?Originally posted by Gibbon View PostShow me that proof. Plenty is not a mathematical function. Can you imagine a requirement: 'give the engine plenty of fuel'.
Originally posted by Gibbon View PostNice jibe on the Latin, are you published? I am, perhaps we could exchange papers, mine's on Horace odes 3.14.
Not sure why NLyUK brought up Latin may have well have brought up philosophy.
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Apologies. I just assumed you were uneducated from your poor grasp of grammar. Plenty is a pronoun in the context used. It could stand for either countable countable nouns.Originally posted by Gibbon View PostShow me that proof. Plenty is not a mathematical function. Can you imagine a requirement: 'give the engine plenty of fuel'.
Nice jibe on the Latin, are you published? I am, perhaps we could exchange papers, mine's on Horace odes 3.14.Comment
-
some bloke phoned in to LBC and was saying we should have gone there, arrested her and try to rehabilitate her. I was visualising Rimmer
It would have been funny if wasn't so serious.
She wanted to been seen as a soldier she got to die as one. Good riddance. Drones may well be the nuclear alternative for terrorists, making sure they just don't bother, however we do need to keep an eye on them.Comment
-
That's cos she was a blonde haired blue eyed woman who obviously can't be evil.Originally posted by vetran View Postsome bloke phoned in to LBC and was saying we should have gone there, arrested her and try to rehabilitate her.
Anyone who tried to arrest her would be dead.
A terrorist is a terrorist regardless of what they look like."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment