• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Another One

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Another One"

Collapse

  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    some bloke phoned in to LBC and was saying we should have gone there, arrested her and try to rehabilitate her.
    That's cos she was a blonde haired blue eyed woman who obviously can't be evil.

    Anyone who tried to arrest her would be dead.

    A terrorist is a terrorist regardless of what they look like.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    some bloke phoned in to LBC and was saying we should have gone there, arrested her and try to rehabilitate her. I was visualising Rimmer



    It would have been funny if wasn't so serious.

    She wanted to been seen as a soldier she got to die as one. Good riddance. Drones may well be the nuclear alternative for terrorists, making sure they just don't bother, however we do need to keep an eye on them.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    Show me that proof. Plenty is not a mathematical function. Can you imagine a requirement: 'give the engine plenty of fuel'.

    Nice jibe on the Latin, are you published? I am, perhaps we could exchange papers, mine's on Horace odes 3.14.
    Apologies. I just assumed you were uneducated from your poor grasp of grammar. Plenty is a pronoun in the context used. It could stand for either countable countable nouns.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    Show me that proof. Plenty is not a mathematical function. Can you imagine a requirement: 'give the engine plenty of fuel'.
    You mean like the requirements plenty of us get from business users until we nail them down?


    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    Nice jibe on the Latin, are you published? I am, perhaps we could exchange papers, mine's on Horace odes 3.14.


    Not sure why NLyUK brought up Latin may have well have brought up philosophy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    Plenty defines the number at least >0, so it is a false dichotomy. 'Plenty' in this context is a pronoun, not a noun, and is correct and sufficient to define a false dichotomy.

    Regrettably, you are displaying a lack of education. It is a pity nobody took the trouble to teach you some Latin.
    Show me that proof. Plenty is not a mathematical function. Can you imagine a requirement: 'give the engine plenty of fuel'.

    Nice jibe on the Latin, are you published? I am, perhaps we could exchange papers, mine's on Horace odes 3.14.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    Plenty defines the number at least >0, so it is a false dichotomy. 'Plenty' in this context is a pronoun, not a noun, and is correct and sufficient to define a false dichotomy.

    Regrettably, you are displaying a lack of education. It is a pity nobody took the trouble to teach you some Latin.
    To be fair, I thought he was doing OK, for an ape...you could maybe chuck him a banana ffs...

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    Not necessarily, plenty /= most or a majority, just that there is enough to satisfy a need, be it physical or opinion. Both guilty of using a noun where a comparative adjective would be more appropriate.
    Plenty defines the number at least >0, so it is a false dichotomy. 'Plenty' in this context is a pronoun, not a noun, and is correct and sufficient to define a false dichotomy.

    Regrettably, you are displaying a lack of education. It is a pity nobody took the trouble to teach you some Latin.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post


    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    So if plenty do and plenty don't, it is a false dichotomy.
    Not necessarily, plenty /= most or a majority, just that there is enough to satisfy a need, be it physical or opinion. Both guilty of using a noun where a comparative adjective would be more appropriate.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    And plenty don't.
    So if plenty do and plenty don't, it is a false dichotomy.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    Sounds like a false dichotomy. Plenty of people reject the mad religious and/or political cults they are raised in.
    And plenty don't.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by rl4engc View Post
    Jesus wept, imagine how the kids dad feels now.

    The silver lining in all this is that all these twunt jihadis who've died for their "cause", have now pretty much had that "cause" snuffed out. Weren't they all holed up in the hospital in Raqqa the last time I looked, no doubt with human shields and demanding safe passage out.
    That will be Nigel Farage in a year's time with his khaki shirt and gun, demanding the hardest of Brexits.

    Leave a comment:


  • rl4engc
    replied
    The 12-year-old boy, now named Hamza, is believed to have been forced to execute prisoners during his time there after being brainwashed by jihadis. A nine-minute ISIS video issued last year appeared to show the boy executing a captured prisoner in a firing squad.
    Jesus wept, imagine how the kids dad feels now.

    The silver lining in all this is that all these twunt jihadis who've died for their "cause", have now pretty much had that "cause" snuffed out. Weren't they all holed up in the hospital in Raqqa the last time I looked, no doubt with human shields and demanding safe passage out.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Oddly I was reading an old article about her before I heard an hour later she was no more.

    She had the idea that she was going to bring all her kids up to be jihadists. The boys, when adults, like their fathers were expected to give their lives for the cause.

    So it's a case of is it better that he died now, innocent, or later, guilty of something.
    Sounds like a false dichotomy. Plenty of people reject the mad religious and/or political cults they are raised in.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    The young hell spawn was probably completely brainwashed, and would have been a complete liability and danger in years to come.

    But don't blame the drone strike, blame the deranged mother.
    Oddly I was reading an old article about her before I heard an hour later she was no more.

    She had the idea that she was going to bring all her kids up to be jihadists. The boys, when adults, like their fathers were expected to give their lives for the cause.

    So it's a case of is it better that he died now, innocent, or later, guilty of something.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X