- Thanks received
- 730
And plenty don't.
So if plenty do and plenty don't, it is a false dichotomy.
And plenty don't.
So if plenty do and plenty don't, it is a false dichotomy.
Bites the dust.
British ISIS recruiter Sally Jones 'killed' by drone | Daily Mail Online
What a pity it took so long...

Not necessarily, plenty /= most or a majority, just that there is enough to satisfy a need, be it physical or opinion. Both guilty of using a noun where a comparative adjective would be more appropriate.
Plenty defines the number at least >0, so it is a false dichotomy. 'Plenty' in this context is a pronoun, not a noun, and is correct and sufficient to define a false dichotomy.
Regrettably, you are displaying a lack of education. It is a pity nobody took the trouble to teach you some Latin.
Plenty defines the number at least >0, so it is a false dichotomy. 'Plenty' in this context is a pronoun, not a noun, and is correct and sufficient to define a false dichotomy.
Regrettably, you are displaying a lack of education. It is a pity nobody took the trouble to teach you some Latin.
You mean like the requirements plenty of us get from business users until we nail them down?Show me that proof. Plenty is not a mathematical function. Can you imagine a requirement: 'give the engine plenty of fuel'.

Nice jibe on the Latin, are you published? I am, perhaps we could exchange papers, mine's on Horace odes 3.14.

Show me that proof. Plenty is not a mathematical function. Can you imagine a requirement: 'give the engine plenty of fuel'.
Nice jibe on the Latin, are you published? I am, perhaps we could exchange papers, mine's on Horace odes 3.14.
some bloke phoned in to LBC and was saying we should have gone there, arrested her and try to rehabilitate her.