Originally posted by vetran
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Home Office taking...
Collapse
X
-
To be fair UK judges tend to refer upwards when they aren't sure and think we need clarification so it isn't surprising we lose."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR -
If British people were being removed from other EU countries and the Commission ignored the complaints, the Daily Express would be outraged.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostThe guy with the custodian sentence for driving is the only one you could easily argue the paper gave enough info on why he should be removed.
Plus he is a Swedish national and we tend to be less prejudice against Nordic nationals that those from the former Eastern bloc.
Oddly no complaints about us removing Romanian nationals from a certain cultural background.I'm alright JackComment
-
Only if they had a blonde haired blue eyed middle class British woman under 45 to use as one of their victims. Everyone else can go feck themselves.Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostIf British people were being removed from other EU countries and the Commission ignored the complaints, the Daily Express would be outraged."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Quite. Much of the article is meaningless really, just a few cases quoted with very little information and some of those look rather dubious. A guy was really taken to a removal centre because his landlord attacked him? I suspect there is rather more to it. And "clear mental health problems" could mean anything from depression to dangerous psychosis.the custodian sentence for driving is the only one you could easily argue the paper gave enough info on why he should be removed
Whatever side we are on, maybe we should not draw conclusions without a lot more information.bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
well said, maybe someone should tell the Granuiad?Originally posted by xoggoth View PostQuite. Much of the article is meaningless really, just a few cases quoted with very little information and some of those look rather dubious. A guy was really taken to a removal centre because his landlord attacked him? I suspect there is rather more to it. And "clear mental health problems" could mean anything from depression to dangerous psychosis.
Whatever side we are on, maybe we should not draw conclusions without a lot more information.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment