I watched an interview today on sky news where the russian friend of the Alexander Litvinenko, is trying his hardest to blame Putin. And there was another man who was giving an example of why it may of not been Putin.
But the crazy sky news reporter said it must of been of Putin who was behind this because (wait for it) Alexander Litvinenko said on his death bed it was Putin?
So here we have Sky News convicting Putin on no evidence what so ever but for the words of a dying man who he himself knew quite well he does not know the truth behind his poisoning.
So this is yet another clear example of Government involvment on the news channels to make sure those reading the news accuse and convict Putin based on total Bull tulip.
Surely there is some way to hold these news channels to account for convicting verbally a leader of another Country for a murder (which is debatable) whithout a shred of evidence to back up their wild accusations of murder.
And yet no one replied to her saying how f/king stupid she is to even say what she said.
The news reporter on Sky News knew that what she said was scandalous yet she said it. Why?
To say Putin must be guilty because Alexander Litvinenko said so is outright pathetic.
It is just a nail in the coffin of Sky News and their credability is zero.
Again where are James Bonds of the MI5 and there colleagues in the MI6 when this guy was killed in front of their Bleeding Noses???
But the crazy sky news reporter said it must of been of Putin who was behind this because (wait for it) Alexander Litvinenko said on his death bed it was Putin?
So here we have Sky News convicting Putin on no evidence what so ever but for the words of a dying man who he himself knew quite well he does not know the truth behind his poisoning.
So this is yet another clear example of Government involvment on the news channels to make sure those reading the news accuse and convict Putin based on total Bull tulip.
Surely there is some way to hold these news channels to account for convicting verbally a leader of another Country for a murder (which is debatable) whithout a shred of evidence to back up their wild accusations of murder.
And yet no one replied to her saying how f/king stupid she is to even say what she said.
The news reporter on Sky News knew that what she said was scandalous yet she said it. Why?
To say Putin must be guilty because Alexander Litvinenko said so is outright pathetic.
It is just a nail in the coffin of Sky News and their credability is zero.
Again where are James Bonds of the MI5 and there colleagues in the MI6 when this guy was killed in front of their Bleeding Noses???
Comment