UK government is bluffing with cards everyone can see

[original PM]

So you believe in breaking the rules? Do you also just walk out of contracts?

No because only i would benefit from that.

In this case millions would benefit.

[WTFH]

No because only i would benefit from that.

In this case millions would benefit.

Why/how would they benefit?

You're going to struggle with this one, but you can't blame the EU. No article 50, no discussions. It is really that simple.
If the UK government refuse to invoke article 50, it's not the EU's fault.
The media you believe in might try to convince you otherwise, but until the UK government actually do something, then the EU has nothing to to do and cannot be held responsible at all for the abject failure of the Leave camp and the UK government.

[AtW]

Why/how would they benefit?

What he meant to say that new millions will be on benefits...

[vetran]

So you believe in breaking the rules? Do you also just walk out of contracts?

no but ny sensible deal can be renegotiated if both parties agree its for the good of both parties. In fact the law can go straight through contracts if people are likely to suffer severe mental or physical hardship Judges do it all the time.

A bremainer - Oh look there is a pear, oh look this is just like it but the leavers call it a apple - idiots.

[AtW]

no but ny sensible deal can be renegotiated if both parties agree its for the good of both parties.

One (much bigger) party can't allow good deal for a much smaller party, as otherwise that big party will seize to exist.

So, there won't be a good deal, or any deal at all, but don't dispair - Boris said it's ok...

[darmstadt]

no but ny sensible deal can be renegotiated if both parties agree its for the good of both parties. In fact the law can go straight through contracts if people are likely to suffer severe mental or physical hardship Judges do it all the time.

A bremainer - Oh look there is a pear, oh look this is just like it but the leavers call it a apple - idiots.

More utter and complete gibberish, here have a picture...

[original PM]

Why/how would they benefit?

You're going to struggle with this one, but you can't blame the EU. No article 50, no discussions. It is really that simple.
If the UK government refuse to invoke article 50, it's not the EU's fault.
The media you believe in might try to convince you otherwise, but until the UK government actually do something, then the EU has nothing to to do and cannot be held responsible at all for the abject failure of the Leave camp and the UK government.

They would benefit because they would know whether they would be able to reside in the country they currently do or whether they may need to move back to either the EU or the UK depending on their circumstances.

Do not ever think that because a decision has been made which affects people you can then hide behind a set of rules which when put under a real test clearly falls apart.

Do you want to continue to just follow orders - how did that work for Germany last time.

If a law does not work and affects people and an unintended way then change it.

[SandyD]

Theresa May is the one who has tunnel vision and can't think of anything further than immigration issues!!

Genuine questions, why stopping benefits (or making changes to it) is related to Brexit? If as the previous guys said 'providing service for benefits' is the aim .. yes great idea, but why can't it happen without Brexit and economical + possibly physical break down of the UK??

[Fronttoback]

One (much bigger) party can't allow good deal for a much smaller party, as otherwise that big party will seize to exist.

So, there won't be a good deal, or any deal at all, but don't dispair - Boris said it's ok...

Nonsense. The thing about a deal is that afterwards both parties think they got the better deal out of it.

So if i sell you a car, if it was a "good deal" you think that you got a nice car for a good price. I think I got rid of my burden for more cash than I expected. Both parties are happy even though both think that the other lost out. This is because evaluation of the value of the deal is subjective and dependent on external factors kept private from your counterpart. Thus is the nature of markets.

Does that help babe? More if you need it...

[minestrone]

Like I said which part of the article's accuracy are you challenging?
If it's all bollux it won't be hard to pick specific bits that are wrong, no?

"Sure, their sudden introduction will force some car companies to move to Europe"

A day later...

Toyota to invest £240m in UK plant at Burnaston - BBC News

The worlds largest car manufacturer is clearly unconcerned.

GDP was already meant to be 6% down by now with a million more out of work, it's the same bedwetters making these tulipe predictions.