Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
He's happy that if his wife, daughter, sister or other female relation is subjected to unwelcome touching like that they wouldn't react.
no I'm not, I said that both sides were at fault.
You lot seem to think vigilante justice is ok.
Of course if the driver had realised what was happening (assuming it wasn't faked) and opened the door on her smashing the bike & her it would be who's fault?
You will notice she was the first one to reach out & touch (she hit the vans window repeatedly).
Of course if the driver had realised what was happening (assuming it wasn't faked) and opened the door on her smashing the bike & her it would be who's fault?
You will notice she was the first one to reach out & touch (she hit the vans window repeatedly).
Given that it was fake, the only people at fault are those insisting on sharing fake news that was designed to drive profits to viral marketing companies.
Comment