Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Just so I get it right
Collapse
X
-
They're pro-business not pro-expensive-temp.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishing -
If enforcing IR35 in a new way has dealt with the issue of using Ltds as PSC, then why did they increase dividends tax by 25%???Originally posted by d000hg View PostThey're pro-business not pro-expensive-temp.Comment
-
To stop fat-cat (or fat-squirrel) directors earning millions and getting big tax-cuts compared to their workersOriginally posted by AtW View PostIf enforcing IR35 in a new way has dealt with the issue of using Ltds as PSC, then why did they increase dividends tax by 25%???
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
So that's supposed to be pro-business?Originally posted by d000hg View PostTo stop fat-cat (or fat-squirrel) directors earning millions and getting big tax-cuts compared to their workers
What this got to do with directors anyway, tax is on business ownersLast edited by AtW; 23 January 2017, 23:31.Comment
-
The really rich take their winnings offshore dhalingOriginally posted by AtW View PostSo that's supposed to be pro-business?Comment
-
Yup, offshore trust or Ltd owning UK Ltd shares won't pay a dime on tax - so this extra tax is on honest mugs who live in UK and choose to play honestlyOriginally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostThe really rich take their winnings offshore dhalingComment
-
Pro business doesn't have to mean lucrative tax breaks for the rich. That's the Labour view of a Tory government, that all they do is help the rich. Are your socialist roots showing again?Originally posted by AtW View PostSo that's supposed to be pro-business?
What this got to do with directors anyway, tax is on business ownersOriginally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
What tax breaks??? If company is paying corp tax that should be recognized in the dividends tax, which is levied on same money. It's double taxation in the first place, at least taking paid into account would be fair option - pound for pound paid at least.Originally posted by d000hg View PostPro business doesn't have to mean lucrative tax breaks for the rich. That's the Labour view of a Tory government, that all they do is help the rich. Are your socialist roots showing again?
Cons failed to drop tax back to 40% that th ey said was right level, instead they increased fivudeends tax so thst it became at worse level than under 50% Liebir.
The rich pay dividends to offshore holding companies, they are not affected.
This betrayal will cost Tory ScumLast edited by AtW; 24 January 2017, 11:24.Comment
-
If you weren't aware of them then you haven't lost outOriginally posted by AtW View PostWhat tax breaks???
Spouting terms like "double taxation" is misleading. If I tax you 10%, then 10% again on what's left that's double taxation. But that's better than being taxed once at 20%... so the fact it's double taxation alone is meaningless.
Get on with your coding and hire someone to manage the business side of things for you. Or wait until Theresa's race to the bottom.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Time to leave the UK and become resident of the Isle of Man I think.Originally posted by AtW View PostWhat tax breaks??? If company is paying corp tax that should be recognized in the dividends tax, which is levied on same money. It's double taxation in the first place, at least taking paid into account would be fair option - pound for pound paid at least.
Cons failed to drop tax back to 40% that th ey said was right level, instead they increased fivudeends tax so thst it became at worse level than under 50% Liebir.
The rich pay dividends to offshore holding companies, they are not affected.
This betrayal will cost Tory Scum"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment