• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Enemies of the People

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #81
    Originally posted by BlueSharp View Post
    Labour Brexit voters who's jobs depend on single market access will vote for him over Ukip any day of the week. He has also taken the floating vote from the Torys which in my opinion is much larger then the hard brexit May is planning.
    Scottish Labour voters vote SNP.

    In England people are looking at the smaller parties.
    "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

    Comment


      #82
      Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
      You really don't see the irony in your posts, do you?
      I do. I gave up reasoned argument a while ago on these subjects because of responses like GB9's.
      Originally posted by GB9 View Post
      Having read a number of replies and blogs about the Court's decision it appears to come down to nothing more than opinion.
      Yes, a reasoned opinion, and the judges have , "citing precedent, explained very clearly and carefully why parliament is sovereign in these matters and must pass an act to begin Brexit."
      If you disagree then please, citing precedent and the relevant laws, explain very clearly and carefully why parliament is not sovereign in these matters, and so Brexit can begin without an act. Attack the arguments not the people. I doubt you can. You just have a vague feeling they're wrong.

      Anyway, nonsense aside, I'm pretty much with Iain Martin on this. Regardless of the merits of the judgement, what followed from the Fail and others was, indeed, a load of bollocks.

      https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...ght-article-50
      Well, I'm glad my original assertion has been proved wrong. (But my assertion for GB9 being pig ignorant and limited in comprehension of basic logic seems to continue to be proved correct with his every post).
      Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

      Comment


        #83
        Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
        I do. I gave up reasoned argument a while ago on these subjects
        It hadn't gone unnoticed. The argument still rages as to whether or not you ever, in fact, started with any reasoned argument!!

        Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
        Well, I'm glad to know that not all Brexiters' brains are neuron free zone.
        Really? Surely that scuppers the main plank of your tedious bollocks that consistently suggests all 17.4M Leavers are all in total agreement about any negative rumour you can unearth?
        Make your tiny mind up!

        “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

        Comment


          #84
          Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
          I do. I gave up reasoned argument a while ago on these subjects because of responses like GB9's.
          Yes, a reasoned opinion, and the judges have , "citing precedent, explained very clearly and carefully why parliament is sovereign in these matters and must pass an act to begin Brexit."
          If you disagree then please, citing precedent and the relevant laws, explain very clearly and carefully why parliament is not sovereign in these matters, and so Brexit can begin without an act. Attack the arguments not the people. I doubt you can. You just have a vague feeling they're wrong.

          Well, I'm glad my original assertion has been proved wrong. (But my assertion for GB9 being pig ignorant and limited in comprehension of basic logic seems to continue to be proved correct with his every post).
          Reasoned by those already in favour of the EU, hence unsafe.

          I assume you agree that someone responsible for the EU Integration Group should not be ruling on whether or not we should integrate with the EU?

          Comment


            #85
            Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
            It hadn't gone unnoticed. The argument still rages as to whether or not you ever, in fact, started with any reasoned argument!!


            I stand corrected. You do have a sense of humour.
            Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

            Comment


              #86
              Originally posted by GB9 View Post
              Reasoned by those already in favour of the EU, hence unsafe.

              I assume you agree that someone responsible for the EU Integration Group should not be ruling on whether or not we should integrate with the EU?
              So, what was your problem with the other judges?
              Are the only judges/laws you are prepared to accept these days the ones endorsed by Goebels Murdoch and the fascists?
              …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

              Comment


                #87
                Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post


                I stand corrected. You do have a sense of humour.
                “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

                Comment


                  #88
                  Originally posted by WTFH View Post
                  So, what was your problem with the other judges?
                  Are the only judges/laws you are prepared to accept these days the ones endorsed by Goebels Murdoch and the fascists?
                  One is a personal friend of the Blairs, as in "I will do everything I can to stop Brexit".

                  Just out of interest, which of the 2 High Courts do you think has the correct opinion? The London one, which says the Government can't implement A50, or the Belfast Court which said it can?

                  Comment


                    #89
                    Originally posted by GB9 View Post
                    One is a personal friend of the Blairs, as in "I will do everything I can to stop Brexit".

                    Just out of interest, which of the 2 High Courts do you think has the correct opinion? The London one, which says the Government can't implement A50, or the Belfast Court which said it can?
                    Keep digging to display your stupidity even more.

                    All the cases that have been brought are on different points of law therefore the rulings aren't the same for that reason.
                    "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                    Comment


                      #90
                      Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
                      It hadn't gone unnoticed. The argument still rages as to whether or not you ever, in fact, started with any reasoned argument!!



                      Really? Surely that scuppers the main plank of your tedious bollocks that consistently suggests all 17.4M Leavers are all in total agreement about any negative rumour you can unearth?
                      Make your tiny mind up!

                      It is fun to say that Brexit supporters are all racist idiots but in truth they are an alliance of racists, idiots, extremists, the desperate and ne'er-do-wells.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X