- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Heathrow runway - will it ever happen?
Collapse
X
-
-
Would make sense. Build a new M25 a mile or so outside the existing one and land planes on the old M25. Job done. You can have 4 runways that way (North, South, East and West).Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostCynic. Its only for the interim

Comment
-
Originally posted by barrydidit View PostWould make sense. Build a new M25 a mile or so outside the existing one and land planes on the old M25. Job done. You can have 4 runways that way (North, South, East and West).
Barry, you should pitch to the project team, they need "members" like you
The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
Actually, the M4 would be about the right size/width/location. Why not close it from Jn2 - 4b and turn Heston Services into Terminal 6.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Trouble in paradise.
Boris Johnson says Heathrow airport expansion is 'undeliverable' - minutes after Government backs third runway
Heathrow expansion has been given the go-ahead by the Government but the Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson has labelled the plan as "undeliverable".
Tory MP Zac Goldsmith also resigned in protest after the third runway scheme was chosen by Theresa May and her ministers.
Mr Goldsmith, the MP for Richmond Park and Kingston, told his constituency branch that he would be resigning.
Proposals to expand an existing runway at Heathrow or build a second runway at Gatwick have been rejected.
A public consultation will now be held on the impact of a third runway at the west London hub before the final decision is put to MPs for a vote in the winter of 2017/18.
Mr Johnson opened a Cabinet rift by opposing the plans and suggesting that it is "very likely it will be stopped".
Justine Greening, the Education Secretary, is also expected to send a message to her constituents in Putney, south-west London, making clear that she is opposed to expanding Heathrow.
Giving the green light to Heathrow comes after nearly two decades of delays by successive Labour and Conservative governments.
Heathrow is viewed as the preferred option because it has significantly more focused on long-haul flights and carries significantly more air freight.Comment
-
Visionary consultancy like this doesn't come cheap. They can't afford me.Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostBarry, you should pitch to the project team, they need "members" like you
Perfect. Sounds less hassle too. Have you got a fag packet to draft the plans on? I presume we could dig a big tunnel to stick the rest of the motorway in? London people seem to like travelling in tunnels so I expect they'd be cool with that.Originally posted by WTFH View PostActually, the M4 would be about the right size/width/location. Why not close it from Jn2 - 4b and turn Heston Services into Terminal 6.Comment
-
"Blue sky" thinkingOriginally posted by barrydidit View PostVisionary consultancy like this doesn't come cheap. They can't afford me.
The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
Tunnel? Nah, I was going to build a bridge for the motorway...Originally posted by barrydidit View PostPerfect. Sounds less hassle too. Have you got a fag packet to draft the plans on? I presume we could dig a big tunnel to stick the rest of the motorway in? London people seem to like travelling in tunnels so I expect they'd be cool with that.
(Think about it)…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Just stick all of London in a tunnel. Then you can turn the above-ground part into airports and cycle lanes.Originally posted by barrydidit View PostPerfect. Sounds less hassle too. Have you got a fag packet to draft the plans on? I presume we could dig a big tunnel to stick the rest of the motorway in? London people seem to like travelling in tunnels so I expect they'd be cool with that.Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
-
3rd runway has been a possibility since I was a child.Originally posted by VectraMan View PostHow dumb do you have to be to move to that part of west London / Berkshire and then discover there's an airport there. Even then it'll still be £1m for a bedsit.
There was an old biddy on the radio saying she doesn't want it. Given that she was there before the airport I have a little sympathy. Given that she'll be dead before it's built and my sympathy just ran out.See You Next TuesdayComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Comment