- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Interviewers getting younger
Collapse
X
-
-
Just because she would not let you lick her lollipop....Originally posted by suityou01 View PostCojak
HTHComment
-
Comment
-
This'll sort out those know-it-all young Agile/story board/sprint whipper snappers:Originally posted by suityou01 View PostBlimey these guys this morning looked like they needed some milk, cookies and nap time.
Does your Mum know your here?
Referring back to coding technologies they "had heard of", which seemed like yesterday.
Stop the planet, I want to get off.
// What does the following C++ line output and why ?
int a = 10; int *b = &a; cout << *b << endl;Comment
-
I want to say 10 as you set the pointer b to be the reference a.Originally posted by SunnyInHades View PostThis'll sort out those know-it-all young Agile/story board/sprint whipper snappers:
// What does the following C++ line output and why ?
int a = 10; int *b = &a; cout << *b << endl;
Then again you are outputting the pointer not the variable.Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
-
Wrong!Originally posted by suityou01 View PostI want to say 10 as you set the pointer b to be the reference a.
Then again you are outputting the pointer not the variable.
It outputs this:
Comment
-
Agile/story board/sprint whipper snapper obviously. Then again so is SIH for not using printf.Originally posted by suityou01 View PostThen again you are outputting the pointer not the variable.
There was an entertaining thread a few years back where some "programmers" were up in arms at being expected to know that i<<2 was equivalent to multiplying by four.Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
-
No he's not, the *b dereferences the pointer, ergo rsult is 10.Originally posted by suityou01 View PostThen again you are outputting the pointer not the variable.
IIRC
Comment
-
Programming and Software Development have diverged.
Programmers know how to implement a doubly linked list using pointers to pointers in one line of code.
Software Developers know the differences between docker, puppet, chef and vagrant and what the state of each beta release is at.
In the past it was acceptable to be a C++ programmer, now you need in-depth knowledge of 50+ open source projects that change on a daily basis.Comment
-
provided neither of the two high-order bits are set, bacause they will be discarded.Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
There was an entertaining thread a few years back where some "programmers" were up in arms at being expected to know that i<<2 was equivalent to multiplying by four.
(although I suppose the same would happen if one multiplied by 4, if an exception wasn't raised)Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- AI interviews are here. Here's how IT contractors can ace them Today 06:53
- Closing your limited company isn't failure. It's just the end of a chapter. Yesterday 05:00
- Young people not in education, employment or training isn’t a contractor’s problem. It’s a problem for us all Jun 5 05:26
- How does HMRC’s forward interest change benefit contractors? Jun 4 04:22
- What are Bills of Exchange, and should HMRC's alert worry umbrella contractors? Jun 3 04:09
- Bills of Exchange fail to avoid new umbrella company rules, says HMRC Jun 2 05:32
- Is permanent employment still the safer bet? Yes, but it's a lot less safe than it used to be. Jun 1 04:34
- Is your Director’s Loan Account (DLA) a target of HMRC’s closer look at close companies? May 29 04:45
- Is your Director’s Loan Account (DLS) a target of HMRC’s closer look at close companies? May 29 04:45
- Contractors, are you making any of the five big limited company bank account mistakes of 2026? May 28 05:51

Comment