FAO NAT - Illness Causing Trigger Happy Moderation.

[MrMarkyMark]

So, I get an infraction for joking about your illness in the professional forums.

Nice impartial moderation, I can only assume the man flu was worse than expected, get well soon

NATs ill, its affecting his moderation "skills"

http://forums.contractoruk.com/busin...ml#post2294895

[FatLazyContractor]

So, I get an infraction for joking about your illness in the professional forums.

Nice impartial moderation, I can only assume the man flu was worse than expected, get well soon



http://forums.contractoruk.com/busin...ml#post2294895

Did you get it from WTFH?

[NotAllThere]

So, I get an infraction for joking about your illness in the professional forums...

No. You got an infraction because you posted an off-topic response about my illness affecting my ability to moderate. Normally an off-topic response wouldn't get an infraction, but I thought it would be funny to infract you to demonstrate that my moderation abilities are as they have ever been - partial and prone to abuse.

Deary me. Some people are so sensitive. It's not like you been banned for a week, or I killed your cat.

[WTFH]

Deary me. Some people are so sensitive. It's not like you been banned for a week, or I killed your cat.

How about we ban his cat for a week and I invite him round for a walk in the woods?

[FatLazyContractor]

No. You got an infraction because you posted an off-topic response about my illness affecting my ability to moderate. Normally an off-topic response wouldn't get an infraction, but I thought it would be funny to infract you to demonstrate that my moderation abilities are as they have ever been - partial and prone to abuse.

Deary me. Some people are so sensitive. It's not like you been banned for a week, or I killed your cat.

So you infract people for your own fun?

Paging Admin

[MrMarkyMark]

No. You got an infraction because you posted an off-topic response about my illness affecting my ability to moderate. Normally an off-topic response wouldn't get an infraction, but I thought it would be funny to infract you to demonstrate that my moderation abilities are as they have ever been - partial and prone to abuse.

Deary me. Some people are so sensitive. It's not like you been banned for a week, or I killed your cat.

Can't argue with the description of what I have been sold I suppose.

Not really, you thought it was funny to give it, I thought to add to this joviality, I would create this post about it.

Win win

[FatLazyContractor]

Can't argue with the description of what I have been sold I suppose.

Not really, you thought it was funny to give it, I thought to add to this joviality, I would create this post about it.

Win win

That said, you exposed the old fart

[MrMarkyMark]

That said, you exposed the old fart

Collateral damage, old boy.

Still, I know NAT more than holds his own, especially as he possesses the ban hammer

[MarillionFan]

Collateral damage, old boy.

Still, I know NAT more than holds his own, especially as he possesses the ban hammer

Funny? I thought he was holding WFTHs.

[MrMarkyMark]

Funny? I thought he was holding WFTHs.

No, he said due to the nasty rash he got, after the last CUK Moderators jolly (paid out of our subs!!), he won't be doing that again.