• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "FAO NAT - Illness Causing Trigger Happy Moderation."

Collapse

  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View Post
    So you infract people for your own fun?

    Paging Admin
    A previous mod banned a certain poster for a tenner a day.

    http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...ml#post1614054

    Sadly, the page is closed now.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View Post
    So you infract people for your own fun? ...
    Of course. Although sometimes it's just a dice roll.

    Which part of "my moderation abilities are as they have ever been - partial and prone to abuse" did you fail to understand?

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    Funny? I thought he was holding WFTHs.
    No, he said due to the nasty rash he got, after the last CUK Moderators jolly (paid out of our subs!!), he won't be doing that again.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
    Collateral damage, old boy.

    Still, I know NAT more than holds his own, especially as he possesses the ban hammer
    Funny? I thought he was holding WFTHs.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View Post
    That said, you exposed the old fart
    Collateral damage, old boy.

    Still, I know NAT more than holds his own, especially as he possesses the ban hammer

    Leave a comment:


  • FatLazyContractor
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
    Can't argue with the description of what I have been sold I suppose.

    Not really, you thought it was funny to give it, I thought to add to this joviality, I would create this post about it.

    Win win
    That said, you exposed the old fart

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    No. You got an infraction because you posted an off-topic response about my illness affecting my ability to moderate. Normally an off-topic response wouldn't get an infraction, but I thought it would be funny to infract you to demonstrate that my moderation abilities are as they have ever been - partial and prone to abuse.

    Deary me. Some people are so sensitive.
    It's not like you been banned for a week, or I killed your cat.
    Can't argue with the description of what I have been sold I suppose.

    Not really, you thought it was funny to give it, I thought to add to this joviality, I would create this post about it.

    Win win

    Leave a comment:


  • FatLazyContractor
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    No. You got an infraction because you posted an off-topic response about my illness affecting my ability to moderate. Normally an off-topic response wouldn't get an infraction, but I thought it would be funny to infract you to demonstrate that my moderation abilities are as they have ever been - partial and prone to abuse.

    Deary me. Some people are so sensitive. It's not like you been banned for a week, or I killed your cat.
    So you infract people for your own fun?

    Paging Admin

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Deary me. Some people are so sensitive. It's not like you been banned for a week, or I killed your cat.


    How about we ban his cat for a week and I invite him round for a walk in the woods?

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
    So, I get an infraction for joking about your illness in the professional forums...
    No. You got an infraction because you posted an off-topic response about my illness affecting my ability to moderate. Normally an off-topic response wouldn't get an infraction, but I thought it would be funny to infract you to demonstrate that my moderation abilities are as they have ever been - partial and prone to abuse.

    Deary me. Some people are so sensitive. It's not like you been banned for a week, or I killed your cat.

    Leave a comment:


  • FatLazyContractor
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
    So, I get an infraction for joking about your illness in the professional forums.

    Nice impartial moderation, I can only assume the man flu was worse than expected, get well soon



    http://forums.contractoruk.com/busin...ml#post2294895

    Did you get it from WTFH?

    Leave a comment:


  • FAO NAT - Illness Causing Trigger Happy Moderation.

    So, I get an infraction for joking about your illness in the professional forums.

    Nice impartial moderation, I can only assume the man flu was worse than expected, get well soon

    NATs ill, its affecting his moderation "skills"
    http://forums.contractoruk.com/busin...ml#post2294895

Working...
X