Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
That website has a yahoo email address, and keeps the who is information private, therefore it is NOT credible.
I just noticed your little addition to that post.
I went and checked whois for wikiLeaks.org and it is also private, the first email address given for wikleaks on the site is John Pilgers which is [email protected].
Have you any other laughably bad benchmarks for internet credibility?
The majority of the events are clearly terrorist attacks. Others are not - rather part of war. But by labelling them as terror attacks, the figures are inflated, and a distorted view is promoted.
E.g.
The honour killing on 10.06.2016 in Lahore.
Christian man beaten by a Muslim mob in Changa Manga.
While these are in motivated by Muslim religious ideas and intolerance, they are not Islamic Terror Attacks. Because the website doesn't differentiate, and defines Islamaphobe as a non-Muslim who knows more than they are supposed to know about Islam, I can see why it is labelled by some as a hate site.
Anyway, this thread is about the Zionist Occupation Government. Please stay on topic.
I went and checked whois for wikiLeaks.org and it is also private, the first email address given for wikleaks on the site is John Pilgers which is [email protected].
Have you any other laughably bad benchmarks for internet credibility?
Incorrect. I guess it's something you didn't bother to check factually.
On the contacts page, the first person listed is Kristinn Hrafnsson, the official WikiLeaks representative. His phone number and email address @wikileaks.org are clearly given
Comment