• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Help needed - Kick ass graphic idea needed

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post


    He won't get that on his PowerPoint slide.
    No need, he can draw it on his gut. Loadsa room there. And with some judicious flab folding, the relationships could be clearly illustrated.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
      No need, he can draw it on his gut. Loadsa room there. And with some judicious flab folding, the relationships could be clearly illustrated.
      Data tattoo

      http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
        No need, he can draw it on his gut. Loadsa room there. And with some judicious flab folding, the relationships could be clearly illustrated.
        a MOOB graph?

        Comment


          #24
          All these suggestions and not one of you have asked about the day rate. You make me sick.
          The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

          Comment


            #25
            Stop trying to do it in one chart. Instead, you should rank the products by popularity, and then show the connections between those products and all other products, iterating through in separate charts, as necessary. You need to show conditional information, rather than joint information. If there are important connections in groups (e.g. how A and B together are connected to all others separately), you can show that in a conditional chart too, depending on what is necessary to support your analysis. That way, you can summarise any important connections in words, and point to specific charts (e.g. in an appendix to the main presentation/document) to show the inter-connectivity when questioned. Even if there were a chart that could visually depict what you want, the volume of information would obscure any analysis you were trying to emphasise.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
              Stop trying to do it in one chart. Instead, you should rank the products by popularity, and then show the connections between those products and all other products, iterating through in separate charts, as necessary. You need to show conditional information, rather than joint information. If there are important connections in groups (e.g. how A and B together are connected to all others separately), you can show that in a conditional chart too, depending on what is necessary to support your analysis. That way, you can summarise any important connections in words, and point to specific charts (e.g. in an appendix to the main presentation/document) to show the inter-connectivity when questioned. Even if there were a chart that could visually depict what you want, the volume of information would obscure any analysis you were trying to emphasise.
              Hence why I tried to point him to Stephen Few, a specialist in visualisations.
              The Chunt of Chunts.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
                Hence why I tried to point him to Stephen Few, a specialist in visualisations.
                Yeah Stephen More and Joseph Tonnes are not the solution.
                http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
                  Yeah Stephen More and Joseph Tonnes are not the solution.
                  LOL

                  https://www.perceptualedge.com/about.php
                  The Chunt of Chunts.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
                    It'll look crap. You won't be able to read anything off the first 10/20 bubbles.

                    A, AB, AC, AD, AE, AF etc ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP etc etc

                    Impossible to read.

                    So if A is the most adopted and B the second most, what's the best graphic.
                    Seems like the simplest answer is some kind of tree diagram, with the most adopted product at the top, followed by the lesser adopted in order down the page/screen, somewhat like a family tree, with each pair joined by bars whose thickness is proportional to the sum of the prevalence of the group(s) that pair finds itself in.

                    But you'll have to be selective, and maybe include only the top ten lines at most. If you really want something flash, you could have an interactive SVG image where they can click on individual products and see just these "pair bars" going from that product to the others. For a small fee I might be able to whump up something like that this weekend.

                    Oh and in theory there's a shed load more than 144 possible combinations - You're talking factorials!
                    Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
                      Hence why I tried to point him to Stephen Few, a specialist in visualisations.




                      Wasn't overly impressed with his site.


                      Someone has recommended a Dendrogram. I quite like it, especially this one. Looks like Fat Lazy Contractors family tree


                      What happens in General, stays in General.
                      You know what they say about assumptions!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X