• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Women tennis players pay

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
    The request was for 'better' rather than 'biggest'. Obviously, when it comes to breasts, that's the same thing. Except where FLC's sweaty moobs are concerned. HTH
    Some say that anything more than a handful is a waste. Or a mouthful. I am not so sure.....

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
      Some say that anything more than a handful is a waste. Or a mouthful. I am not so sure.....
      I see why your wife hates me ever since my first date with her

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
        Synchronised swimming, gymnastics both have a higher profile for women than men.
        Both you could argue are entertainment as they are scored on points..... <ducks and runs>
        'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

        Comment


          #24
          Netball

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
            I don't think there should be any sexism in sport. Sexism is wrong and wrong is for women.

            HTHBIDI
            Trouble is people like you turn this sort of thing into an argument about sexism. it is actually an argument about market forces. If you want to remove sexism from the equation then make men and women play against each other in the same tournament. You cannot expect to have it both ways.
            Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
              Trouble is people like you turn this sort of thing into an argument about sexism. it is actually an argument about market forces. If you want to remove sexism from the equation then make men and women play against each other in the same tournament. You cannot expect to have it both ways.
              We know who you want to get more money. Whoever you get the largest cut from.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                Trouble is people like you turn this sort of thing into an argument about sexism. it is actually an argument about market forces. If you want to remove sexism from the equation then make men and women play against each other in the same tournament. You cannot expect to have it both ways.
                'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
                  We know who you want to get more money. Whoever you get the largest cut from.
                  Fair comment. 20% of Serena Williams might be a bit too much even for me
                  Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                  Comment


                    #29
                    i will also add that by this argument of paying men and women the same one could also argue that all tennis players should receive the same prize money too
                    Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
                      Synchronised swimming, gymnastics both have a higher profile for women than men.
                      Long distance swimming and free climbing are also sports where women have outperformed men.
                      Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
                      Both you could argue are entertainment as they are scored on points..... <ducks and runs>
                      WNLS
                      Anything that is marked subjectively isn't a sport!
                      An interesting aside is ski jumping:
                      You get scored for "how far" and also "how stylish".....
                      You used to get penalised style marks for landing with one foot in front of the other, it was deemed much more stylish to land with feet together/beside each other.
                      But over a few seasons the better, measured by how far, jumpers worked out that the penalty for an ugly landing was more than outweighed by the addition distance that could be obtained so they all started doing it.
                      So now the style marks have been changed and you get penalised for NOT doing a telemark landing.

                      I think that women do compete at ski jumping - just not at the Olympics etc. I don't see why a woman falling off a mountain wouldn't go as far as a man but I am willing to bet that the longest ski jump was achieved by a man, ignoring any style marks.

                      But also:
                      Higher profile doesn't equal better.

                      Have you got any links to the long distance swimming and free climbing events eg World fastest times or whatever being held by women?

                      NB I am not saying that some women aren't very, very good at particular sports just that the, measurable, best (world record holders etc) are men.
                      My challenge to you still stands - name one sport or event where objectively women are better than or equal to men.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X