Why not include in the Biology discipline, the reproductive system, explain the sexual diseases and how to prevent them, fertile period etc.…
-
-
Originally posted by Troll View Post
If you think that children under the age of consent do not have sex with members of the same sex, with or without sex ed, .....oh i give in......
I love my gay friends. I adore them. I luurve them. Women feel so unthreatened in their company that they don't see me preparing to pounce.
Comment
-
Sex education is more about relationships and consent than just the biology.Originally posted by Bee View Post
One of the modern aims is to stop children being groomed, teaching them to say "No", they can love who they please and informing them that porn isn't the normal world.
It's taught age appropriately so young kids aren't taught about porn. They are taught about being safe online ."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
This is similar to the diagram we had at school. What's missing? IMO this is the problem with teaching sex education as biology.Originally posted by Bee View Post
Comment
-
No one has sex until they leave home and are married haven't you heard?Originally posted by clearedforlanding View Post"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
The reproductive system only it's not enough, it's what I'm talking about.Originally posted by mudskipper View PostThis is similar to the diagram we had at school. What's missing? IMO this is the problem with teaching sex education as biology.
Comment
-
It depends the problems you have in UK, could be:Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
1- Teenager undesired pregnancy,
2- Sexual diseases
3- Moral problems
If you have 1 and 2, you could be prevented in Biology classes.
If the word sex sound so bad for some parents, can be included in Biology.
It's just a thought.Comment
-
Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.Comment
-
A Todger inside?Originally posted by mudskipper View PostWhat's missing?
How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
-
The reddits seem to have decided this is all because David Cameron doesn´t want us to recognise what a c*** looks like.Comment
Comment