Crackdown on personal service companies could raise £400m in tax

[d000hg]

Indeed. I can even provide them a handy browser script to hide my posts entirely:

Ignoring a user means you keep getting the "this post isn't shown" banner which makes you itch to see what is hidden.

But if you use adblock or some other tool to block class="postbitignored postbitim" the offending post just disappears entirely.

In adblock (on chrome at least) the filter you can add is:
forums.contractoruk.com##[class="postbitignored postbitim"]

Hope this is useful to someone, if there's a bug I missed hopefully NickFitz might point it out

[MrMarkyMark]

Indeed. I can even provide them a handy browser script to hide my posts entirely:

Could prove very handy

[MarkT]

Sooooo......about that IR35, PSC thing....

[Contreras]

Indeed. I can even provide them a handy browser script to hide my posts entirely:

Thanks!!

*plonk*

[administrator]

Sooooo......about that IR35, PSC thing....

Here you go:
Leaked IR35 plan to hit PSC contractors 'confirmed' :: Contractor UK

Can't believe this thread dropped off the front page Some more details about we might see next week. Very interesting stuff.

[BlueSharp]

Here you go:
Leaked IR35 plan to hit PSC contractors 'confirmed' :: Contractor UK

Can't believe this thread dropped off the front page Some more details about we might see next week. Very interesting stuff.

Interesting stuff. Does this is mean the defense of Substitution and MOO are now dead against IR35?

As they can transfer the liability to the end client only on SDC failure now no client is going to touch an outside IR35 PSC!

[administrator]

Interesting stuff. Does this is mean the defense of Substitution and MOO are now dead against IR35?

Yup, the old rules will be dead.

As they can transfer the liability to the end client only on SDC failure now no client is going to touch an outside IR35 PSC!

Not sure about that, in terms of clients working with outside IR35 contractors. If the online test shows outside then they will be outside and that should be fine. Could be that clients will be able to indemnify the risks somehow...

[The Spartan]

Going by what is in the article, at least it's not as bad as I first thought more work on my part to ensure the client is more educated but none the less not a showstopper.

[BlueSharp]

Not sure about that, in terms of clients working with outside IR35 contractors. If the online test shows outside then they will be outside and that should be fine. Could be that clients will be able to indemnify the risks somehow...

If HMRC come out and say that they are happy to accept it as a defense then that will be great, no more uncertainty. I will not be holding my breath for that statement!

[administrator]

If HMRC come out and say that they are happy to accept it as a defense then that will be great, no more uncertainty. I will not be holding my breath for that statement!

But we know HMRC are failing already, small number of investigations, small number of wins - they just don't have the resource. If they manage to get a "Computer says no" system that works and they can show their masters that it works then why the heck not.