This would have never happened under Labour.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Crackdown on personal service companies could raise £400m in tax
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
FTFY
Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostVery much so. It will be "From next month you are on our senior starter salary of £25K p.a., enjoy!"The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostThis would have never happened under Labour.
If you or anyone else really believes that a Labour government would have refused to crack done on this area when we are faced with a deficit of around £70 billion, then you truly are living in the land of make believe."The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance." CiceroComment
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostVery much so. It will be "From next month you are on our new starter salary of £25K p.a., enjoy!"Comment
-
I see HMRC have settled. So whatever has been decided is set in stone now. Throw those IPSE letters away.Comment
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostComment
-
Originally posted by Waldorf View PostRubbish, my guess is that these plans have been evolving from work done by civil servants in HMRC, rather than directed by politicians. If you or anyone else really believes that a Labour government would have refused to crack done on this area when we are faced with a deficit of around £70 billion, then you truly are living in the land of make believe.
Labour would have put back 50% tax and used more funny money from BoE - they would be under a LOT less pressure to increase tax revenues because they did not set high target of cutting deficit in the first place. So yes, for majority of people on this board they would have been better than the current lot. Crazy though if you ask me going back to April, but that's how it is. Tory Scum are indeed scum.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostLabour would have put back 50% taxComment
-
Originally posted by Platypus View PostAh yes, that tried and tested way of reducing the tax takeComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- ‘Four interest rate cuts in 2025’ not echoed by contractor advisers Today 08:24
- ‘Why Should We Hire You?’ How to answer as an IT contractor Yesterday 09:30
- Even IT contractors connect with 'New Year, New Job.' But… Jan 6 09:28
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
Comment