Key point from this is who do the Government want to own the BTLs when they are sold as they no longer make financial sense.
Now it makes sense to give BTL owners a financial incentive to sell to first time buyers or existing tenants rather than overseas interests or the new rental businesses that will rise up to replace amateur BTLs who will make BTL owners look like pussy cats. It suits the governments policy and it would be no more expensive than subsidising large building firms to encourage first time buyers.
If they go on the open market they will be bought by overseas investors or builders who will strip & redo adding 30% to price.
So the proposal , apart from offending lefty something for nothing merchants which is a good thing, makes a lot of sense.
Now it makes sense to give BTL owners a financial incentive to sell to first time buyers or existing tenants rather than overseas interests or the new rental businesses that will rise up to replace amateur BTLs who will make BTL owners look like pussy cats. It suits the governments policy and it would be no more expensive than subsidising large building firms to encourage first time buyers.
If they go on the open market they will be bought by overseas investors or builders who will strip & redo adding 30% to price.
So the proposal , apart from offending lefty something for nothing merchants which is a good thing, makes a lot of sense.

Comment