Originally posted by NotAllThere
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Why don't they just change their religion?
Collapse
X
-
-
Glen, I know I've accused you of low intelligence, but please prove me wrong.
Read your signature. Think about it. Think about how flawed it is. Think about why the guy said it, and that it's apparently some sort of slogan.
If you can't understand how it's just a populist phrase, aimed at the more easily-led mob-mentality element of atheism, which cannot be backed up in reality or fact then I despair. Also, it means you're probably one of that group.
If you can, why don't you change it for something anti-religious that isn't so easily refuted? I don't know what, maybe something like "Kick a nun to death and save a soul" or something would reflect your vitriol, your belief that religion is such a terrible thing and your general desire to shock.Comment
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostAnd that makes it alright does it?
The phrase "hate speech" is over-used PC codswallop most of the time, but it seems to me that hate speech towards any segment of the community is pretty disgusting behaviour. If you talked about blacks or gays the same way you talk about people who have a particular religious outlook, you'd be given very short shrift. Hate is hate. The venom and vitriol you exhibit over religion indicates that you're a pretty unpleasant person - Ticktock's depiction of you as 14 year old troll seems a fairly apt description. In another age, you'd be joining in the gay bashing.
Now, I really hope you're not like that - but this is the impression you are giving.Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.Comment
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostAs I said I was asking the question not making assumptions. i agree that you should question whether it would make any difference. Maybe they should negotiate and find out under what circumstances they would be allowed to live on equal terms as all other Burmese.
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostPeople cjoose their religious outlookand their religion is not based on any logic or reality. It is a superstition.
Further, there are many people who've considered deeply the nature of their beliefs and continue to believe - precisely because they have evidence that satisfies them, and they find their religion logically consistent, and intimately connected to reality.
being black or gay is not brought about through choice. just because someone holds extreme views based upon religion does not put them above being challenged.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostTry watching Frankie Boyle's election autopsy on iplayer. Some guy on there was saying that according to white people all black immigrants are immigrants but all white immigrants are ex-pats. Shocked the bbc aired it.
Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostAs I understand it's kind of complicated by the fact that there is a militia group associated with this particular ethnicity that's been fighting the government for quite a while. So it isn't just religion that's the driving factor.
The vast majority of people are born to their religious outlookAnyone who's done even the most cursory study will know that there is a vast different between superstition and religion. Many non-religious people are highly superstitious, so the two cannot possibly be synonymous.
Further, there are many people who've considered deeply the nature of their beliefs and continue to believe - precisely because they have evidence that satisfies them, and they find their religion logically consistent, and intimately connected to reality.
Now I can agree (though it wasn't that long ago that sexuality was considered to be a choice - even by the gay lobby). But there is a difference between challenging beliefs and demonstrating their stupidity and logical inconsistency (á la Dawkins), and spewing hatred and venom towards anyone who might hold such beliefs.
On the matter of religion vs superstition the two things are the same simply because there is no material proof that supports their views. Under the "guise" of religion people can (and do) say and believe whatever they want without having to produce evidence to support.
I think your concept of "hate" and "venom" is directed at anyone that questions or challenges these so called beliefs.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Originally posted by GlenW View PostI don't know I seem to be getting a reaction from you without trying too hard.
I have strong opinions on quite a few things; I oppose the death penalty, I'm a staunch republican, I favour our membership of the EU, but I don't think badly of people who disagree with these views. However, as I have already said on this thread, I have nothing but contempt for religious people.
Intolerant, bigoted and unpleasant? Yes, I guess I am on this subject.How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
-
Originally posted by original PM View Postand many who say they are been persecuted for their faith probably mean it is my chance to get out of this tuliphole so I will make something up...Comment
-
Originally posted by Ticktock View PostI do understand that some people do, and can give them the respect of not going out of my way to belittle or insult themComment
-
Originally posted by expat View PostIt's where a rabid anti-immigration obsession leads.
I'm all for comletely open borders, all things being equals - which they aren't. But you can't eat your cake and still have it. All ukip are guilty of is realising that irrevocable truth.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Comment