Originally posted by DodgyAgent
View Post
It's the same as 3rd wave feminists who, instead of holding sacrifice as a virtue (because individual achievement is harder than collective nihilism) and loathing themselves, instead invent ideas of patriarchy which they then determine to smash - thereby inventing meaning & purpose for their pathetic lives, which cannot be diminished because it was never founded in reality in the first place.
Like the 'social justice' warriors in general, who find that fighting imagined injustices - against those they choose to be viewed as so pathetically incapable of defending themselves - frames their own pathetic lives more favourably when in contrast with those who they toil to defend. You'll notice that genuinely happy achievers tend to have better things to do.
I think our government is a racket, acts on very contradictory & questionable moral principles with regard to it's foreign policy, etc etc - but despite the voting public's naivety, or even wilful ignorance, we aren't a nation of ******* savages. Many other's are.
An underachieving person of little substance, in a civilised country, can elevate their percieved position in society by framing that civilised country as a nation of evil savages.
Just like the fat kids at school can compete in the walking race on sports day - when egoism & achievement is synonymous with evil & cheating, then nihilism and mediocrity can compete for misguided exaltation.
Comment