• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

What can one lone trader at home achieve?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Pondlife View Post
    This is the bit I don't get. How was able to process these transactions so quick over the connections available to a typical household? Especially if you factor the potential losses of not cancelling an order in time.
    Yep, as BlasterBates said, he was just placing orders that he didn't want executed.

    It happens every day in the markets, so I don't know how they can blame one person.

    When you place a limit order at a price, it joins a queue - first in first out type of thing.
    The spoofers pull their orders just before they reach the front of the queue at their chosen price. That will def. need a fast connection.
    'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
    Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by SantaClaus View Post
      Exactly... another case of a game that little people are not allowed to join in.
      Influencing the market and directly defrauding it are not the same. A company who did the same thing he did and got noticed would be penalised.
      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
      Originally posted by vetran
      Urine is quite nourishing

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by d000hg View Post
        Influencing the market and directly defrauding it are not the same. A company who did the same thing he did and got noticed would be penalised.
        He wasn't defrauding it, he was influencing by creating the impression there were large sell orders and then removing them.

        Algo trading companies do this all the time. Market manipulation is how the markets work.
        'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
        Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.

        Comment


          #34
          Creating many orders over and over again with the deliberate intention of cancelling them IS fraud.
          Originally posted by MaryPoppins
          I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
          Originally posted by vetran
          Urine is quite nourishing

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by d000hg View Post
            Creating many orders over and over again with the deliberate intention of cancelling them IS fraud.
            Well in that case, it happens on a daily basis, all day, every day.

            But don't take my word for it, set yourself up with a trading platform that has a DOM (Depth of Market) and watch it all day.
            'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
            Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.

            Comment


              #36
              Interesting article for you finance techies...

              Spoofers Keep Markets Honest

              Spoofers Keep Markets Honest - Bloomberg View
              'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
              Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by SantaClaus View Post
                It's not me, but I know who it was. The guy was a top trader at Futex.

                Seriously though, big corporations are fighting to site their HFT servers as close to the exchange as possible, even building fibre optic connections in a straight line to save nanoseconds. And you're telling me that this guy "Nav" caused the crash all by himself from a rundown semi in Hounslow?
                The guy had made millions, I doubt his trading software was running from that semi, more like a dedicated server hosted very close to the exchange with tiny latencies. He just managed the software from the house in Hounslow.

                He probably had faster trades than many of the banks.

                Comment


                  #38
                  I don't think he did cause the flash crash:

                  Guy Trading at Home Caused the Flash Crash - Bloomberg View

                  but probably helped it a bit

                  The problem was he overdid it. From that article he was told off for spoofing but told the Exchange to "kiss my ass"...and continued to spoof. Looks like someone got p*ssed off and shopped him.

                  As Santa says they're all at it but as long as they don't overdo it they probably turn a blind eye. Basically if they don't damage the exchange they're not bothered, exchange earns money on each trade so while they're earning commission they don't care. During the flash crash they had SEC sniffing around, so that's when they decided to clamp down.
                  Last edited by BlasterBates; 24 April 2015, 11:51.
                  I'm alright Jack

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
                    I don't think he did cause the flash crash:

                    Guy Trading at Home Caused the Flash Crash - Bloomberg View

                    but probably helped it a bit

                    The problem was he overdid it. From that article he was told off for spoofing but told the Exchange to "kiss my ass"...and continued to spoof. Looks like someone got p*ssed off and shopped him.

                    As Santa says they're all at it but as long as they don't overdo it they probably turn a blind eye. Basically if they don't damage the exchange they're not bothered, exchange earns money on each trade so while they're earning commission they don't care. During the flash crash they had SEC sniffing around, so that's when they decided to clamp down.
                    No honour among thieves?
                    Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
                      I don't think he did cause the flash crash:

                      Guy Trading at Home Caused the Flash Crash - Bloomberg View

                      but probably helped it a bit

                      The problem was he overdid it. From that article he was told off for spoofing but told the Exchange to "kiss my ass"...and continued to spoof. Looks like someone got p*ssed off and shopped him.

                      As Santa says they're all at it but as long as they don't overdo it they probably turn a blind eye. Basically if they don't damage the exchange they're not bothered, exchange earns money on each trade so while they're earning commission they don't care. During the flash crash they had SEC sniffing around, so that's when they decided to clamp down.
                      Indeed. Its like tax avoidance. As long as the rich do it then fine. But when the poor start there is a clampdown.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X