FoI, Newspapers, and the BBC

[unixman]

Ah yes, in your fantasy world where 45,672 is a much larger number than 78,463

Lol. Screeching and throwing poop. Great argument. Still, at least your chimpanzee avatar is appropriate. I'll leave you both to it.

[d000hg]

Lol. Screeching and throwing poop. Great argument. Still, at least your chimpanzee avatar is appropriate. I'll leave you both to it.

No, throwing cold hard facts. Boring.

[darmstadt]

Story about it in UK Press Gazette: Daily Mail emerges as BBC's newspaper of choice as corporation cuts down on Guardian | Press Gazette

Remember, folks, you read it here first

See the Huff can't even get the story right (I wonder if they read their comments section)

[NickFitz]

See the Huff can't even get the story right (I wonder if they read their comments section)

The Grauniad too

[mudskipper]

The Grauniad too

So all the news channels just copy each other's stories without checking sources. There's a surprise.

[SueEllen]

Story about it in UK Press Gazette: Daily Mail emerges as BBC's newspaper of choice as corporation cuts down on Guardian | Press Gazette

Remember, folks, you read it here first

You write for them?

[barrydidit]

More FoI stuff re the beeb. This time it's about hotel costs

EXCLUSIVE: BBC spent £44.5m on hotels over five years | News | LondonlovesBusiness.com

I wonder how much time they spend on responding to these FoI queries? i'd better submit one of my own to find out

[NickFitz]

You'll all be pleased to hear that the Beeb gave me incorrect figures

Guardian restored as BBC's newspaper of choice - corporation corrects inaccurate FoI response | Press Gazette

[DodgyAgent]

So all the news channels just copy each other's stories without checking sources. There's a surprise.

We cut and paste job ads from other agencies

[EternalOptimist]

You'll all be pleased to hear that the Beeb gave me incorrect figures

Guardian restored as BBC's newspaper of choice - corporation corrects inaccurate FoI response | Press Gazette

never trust what you read. I make that statement after 125 years of thinking it through