Originally posted by MicrosoftBob
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
limit child benefit to three children?
Collapse
X
-
-
All very well saying "shouldn't" but the point is, once it's happened why should the child be punished for being born?Originally posted by SueEllen View PostThey shouldn't have kids they can't pay for and if it was a multiple birth they should have reduced the number....
And... you're saying if someone has twins, one should be murdered at birth?
Please do us a favour and leave the UK. Your kind of bigotry would be better in some Islamic state, or serving some African dictator.Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View PostEasy solution, anyone with 2 or more children has the choice be steralised or no benefitsOriginally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
It isn't even £20 a week it is £13 something. £20 is only for the first child, £13 for subsequent children.
I do like the idea of putting benefits onto a card, it would be fairly straight forward to limit what people could buy, no cigarettes, no alcohol etc.I'm not even an atheist so much as I am an antitheist; I not only maintain that all religions are versions of the same untruth, but I hold that the influence of churches, and the effect of religious belief, is positively harmful. [Christopher Hitchens]Comment
-
I think benefits claimants SHOULD get a free bus-pass though.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
d000hg I was taking the p1ss.
No one has children for £13 a week."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
I'll take no benefits please. I love getting the missus up the duff.Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View PostEasy solution, anyone with 2 or more children has the choice be steralised or no benefitsComment
-
Because then you would never have been born? How do you think your mum afforded all those fags & booze. She only charged 20p a blow job, it doesn't pay the bills.Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View PostWhy don't they reduce it to zero children?!
What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
Oops. Hard to tell with some of the opinions being voicedOriginally posted by SueEllen View Postd000hg I was taking the p1ss.
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
She was on quite a good day rate and didn't need to buy food either, actually.Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostBecause then you would never have been born? How do you think your mum afforded all those fags & booze. She only charged 20p a blow job, it doesn't pay the bills.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
How do you separate out that child benefit money from other money? Lots of people who get child benefit work. In regards to other benefits the state pension and winter fuel payments are benefits, why should old people be stigmatised? Why should disabled people and their carers be stigmatised?Originally posted by GlenW View PostIt isn't even £20 a week it is £13 something. £20 is only for the first child, £13 for subsequent children.
I do like the idea of putting benefits onto a card, it would be fairly straight forward to limit what people could buy, no cigarettes, no alcohol etc.
Also market stalls don't take cards and it's cheaper for most people to buy their fruit and veg from market stalls than supermarkets.
Finally they did a voucher scheme with asylum seekers at the end of 20th century. All it did was cause problems as it took longer for the shops to process the vouchers."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Today 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Yesterday 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51

Comment