• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Foreign benefit scroungers!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    We got one of those "where your tax got spent" pie charts for my wife. I think the amount her tax paid towards benefits was very close to what one of our young friends, on benefits, stood to claim that year. It made it feel better that we were "paying to look after our friend"
    when you think your wife is probably paying more tax than most don't you find that a bit scary?
    Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

    Comment


      #12
      Public spending doesn't come from taxes anymore and it hasn't come for many years. It comes from printy-printy. Otherwise we would be in a much better state than today.

      The "my taxes are spent on..." argument is pointless.
      <Insert idea here> will never be adopted because the politicians are in the pockets of the banks!

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by petergriffin View Post
        Public spending doesn't come from taxes anymore and it hasn't come for many years. It comes from printy-printy. Otherwise we would be in a much better state than today.

        The "my taxes are spent on..." argument is pointless.
        I haven't got a clue what this means.
        I'm not even an atheist so much as I am an antitheist; I not only maintain that all religions are versions of the same untruth, but I hold that the influence of churches, and the effect of religious belief, is positively harmful. [Christopher Hitchens]

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by GlenW View Post
          I haven't got a clue what this means.
          I had no doubt.
          <Insert idea here> will never be adopted because the politicians are in the pockets of the banks!

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
            On people that are down on their luck when times are tough?
            Yep - They can go and pick fruit. If they are physically incapable they can go out and sell it.
            You make your own luck
            Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by petergriffin View Post
              Public spending doesn't come from taxes anymore and it hasn't come for many years. It comes from printy-printy. Otherwise we would be in a much better state than today.

              The "my taxes are spent on..." argument is pointless.
              Welfare costs about 100 billion a year.

              The government collects over 600 billion in tax each year.

              Welfare abuse is estimated to cost the state a few million a year and 'extreme' cases of welfare use (single moms with 10 kids etc etc) cost another few million a year (note: million. Not billion). As such most of that 100 billion is basic legitimate use of welfare money that can't be dropped or skimmed by efficiency drives.

              So if people want to assume their taxes are spent on it and that 'printy printy' covers other things that CAN be dropped, that's a legitimate assumption to make

              FYI costs are here (it breaks down central and local costs into 2 different columns) http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/ye...c1n_40#ukgs302

              It also makes it very obvious how stupid people look when they piss and moan about welfare tourism. 60 thousand foreigners claiming welfare makes sod all difference to the budget of a country of 60 million people.
              Last edited by NickyBoy; 19 January 2015, 16:58.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                Yep - They can go and pick fruit. If they are physically incapable they can go out and sell it.
                You make your own luck
                What fruit do you pick now in January? Where? How do you make money from it? I want a piece of the cake too.

                Feck contracting, picking fruit is the new Forex!
                <Insert idea here> will never be adopted because the politicians are in the pockets of the banks!

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
                  Harsh, but at the same time, true

                  Maybe we should encourage more of our benefits generational types to bog off abroad and claim in the lands of the EU taxpayer, possibly Scooter will appreciate funding them in his beloved land of the Boxhead.
                  You have a point. It is much cheaper to live in Romania than here. we house their workers who want to work in the council houses and benefits accommodation of those who do want to work here. We put the benefits recipients out to Romania where the cost of keeping them would be so much less.

                  Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by NickyBoy View Post
                    Welfare costs about 60 billion a year.

                    The government collects over 600 billion in tax each year.

                    Welfare abuse is estimated to cost the state a few million a year and 'extreme' cases of welfare use (single moms with 10 kids etc etc) cost another few million a year (note: million. Not billion). As such, most of that 60 billion is basic legitimate, efficient use of welfare money that can't be dropped.

                    So if people want to assume their taxes are spent on it and that 'printy printy' covers other things that CAN be dropped, that's a legitimate assumption to make
                    But benefits and pensions CAN be dropped. It's actually a virtuous cycle: you save money by not spending it on the poor, then the poor die and you save money on pensions.
                    <Insert idea here> will never be adopted because the politicians are in the pockets of the banks!

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by petergriffin View Post
                      What fruit do you pick now in January? Where? How do you make money from it? I want a piece of the cake too.

                      Feck contracting, picking fruit is the new Forex!
                      There are plenty of jobs for everyone. There is no excuse for anyone to not work unless they are terminally ill.
                      Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X