- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
So...anybody ask for any of this?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by Zero Liability View PostComment
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostThe thoughts of one accountant is somewhat different from a trade body which purports to represent 4.5million people, though.Comment
-
My original concern was that IPSE wanted to float the idea of an FLC as a way of gathering a larger membership i.e the self-employed and hadn't fully appreciated that there would be implications if BoS were classified by HMRC as the same. It was all about appealing to a wider audience and therefore having a louder voice.
Now it turns out that this is someone else's idea of how all non-employees should operate and this is turning into damage limitation. The proposals by Philip Ross and the other one on CW that hit my inbox are absolutely NOT what I want.Last edited by Pondlife; 27 November 2014, 14:58.Comment
-
Originally posted by Pondlife View PostMy original concern was that IPSE wanted to float the idea of an FLC as a way of gathering a larger membership i.e the self-employed and hadn't fully appreciated that there would be implications if BoS were classified by HMRC as the same. It was all about appealing to a wider audience and therefore having a louder voice.
Now it turns out that this is someone else's idea of how all non-employees should operate and this is turning into damage limitation. The proposals by Philip Ross and the other one on CW that hit my inbox are absolutely NOT what I want.Comment
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostThere's a big difference between damage limitation and saying "this is what our members want" though.i.e. We've given this a lot of thought so either present a better idea or shut your pie-hole.
Comment
-
...
Originally posted by Pondlife View PostYeah but I can understand that by taking a negative stance for the start they risk the same alienation from Gov that we're getting from the BoD for exactly the same reason.i.e. We've given this a lot of thought so either present a better idea or shut your pie-hole.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Yesterday 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Yesterday 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
Comment