Originally posted by tarbera
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
So...anybody ask for any of this?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
...
Originally posted by tarbera View PostPosting on CUK will not change ipse policy, being on the Ipse CC committee will !!!
It's not exactly a high bar to get elected (just about a walk in) or if your female it is a walk in !!
Thus if several vocal CUK(ipse members) stand for the elections you can set policy rather than whinging about how bad it is.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostDepending on the results of the governance consultation, and whether the CC will actually have any sway any more, it's something that I'm considering.Comment
-
Originally posted by DiscoStu View PostAre IPSE forum handles shown on the manifestos? Just want to make sure I don't vote for youComment
-
Originally posted by tarbera View Postyou can set policy rather than whinging about how bad it is.Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostMeanwhile only yesterday this Philip Ross character from IPSE posted another article:
2014-11-12 Why the UK should form a Freelancer Limited Company...
To register, the freelancer would have to nominate themselves as the FLC’s sole operator (the single shareholder, so not a spouse) and agree to a fixed but fair salary-dividend split.
Note the fair(tm). I wonder who decides whats 'fair'.
In return, registered FLCs could be excluded from some of the more extreme issues of IR35, such as the need to supply a substitute and the need to have multiple clients on the go.
So, to avoid IR35 you have to have multiple clients and the right to substitute.
There would still be a requirement to demonstrate that the contract which a FLC has with a client is not one of employment
So no change then!Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
If Ipse had nothing to hide they would not hide it.
but as has become quite apparent they do have something to hide and are doing so.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by original PM View PostIf Ipse had nothing to hide they would not hide it.
but as has become quite apparent they do have something to hide and are doing so.PSCFLC idea has grown through a process of immersion. IYSWIMComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Yesterday 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
Comment