Originally posted by eek
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
PM: To Kate McCaan
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
It serves them damn well right thenLet us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone -
The parents are also victimsOriginally posted by Batcher View PostSince you are trying to align victims with responsibility, as Madeline was the victim in the McCann's case, are you saying she is responsible for her own disappearance?Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Strangely that is irrelevant. They admitted enough for social services to be able to make them wards of court. The fact it wasn't done seems to have been a political decision as they had suffered enough....Originally posted by d000hg View PostWhat happened as a result of their 'crime' shouldn't influence the sentencing for their 'neglect' though... i.e. if they were caught leaving the child alone but nothing bad had happened, they were no more or less in the wrong than if she was abducted due to their actions.
Did they commit a crime under local law?merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
That's true and I think why so many people are against them. They were interviewed by Leicestershire Social Services and were let off without charge. If a family from a different (poorer) demographic did the same thing they would be charged.Originally posted by d000hg View PostWhat happened as a result of their 'crime' shouldn't influence the sentencing for their 'neglect' though... i.e. if they were caught leaving the child alone but nothing bad had happened, they were no more or less in the wrong than if she was abducted due to their actions.
Did they commit a crime under local law?
I'm not sure about local laws in Portugal though.Comment
-
Their friends also left their children. As, apparently, was common for holiday makers at that resort to do.Originally posted by eek View PostStrangely that is irrelevant. They admitted enough for social services to be able to make them wards of court. The fact it wasn't done seems to have been a political decision as they had suffered enough....
Throw 'em all in jail.
Comment
-
Did the resort end up facing charges for encouraging or being complicit in child neglect?Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
The resort, I believe, offers a babysitting service which was turned down.Originally posted by d000hg View PostDid the resort end up facing charges for encouraging or being complicit in child neglect?Comment
-
PM: To Kate McCaan
As other said, just because others did it doesn't make it right.Originally posted by mudskipper View PostTheir friends also left their children. As, apparently, was common for holiday makers at that resort to do.
Throw 'em all in jail.
And it does seem to be that because they are middle class, social services treated them differently from someone who lived in a council estate and was rumored to do the samemerely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Doing it rarely in a sheltered resort isn't the same as doing it routinely in a high-crime area (council estates statistically ARE higher crime areas, that's not being classist).Originally posted by eek View PostAs other said, just because others did it doesn't make it right.
And it does seem to be that because they are middle class, social services treated them differently from someone who lived in a council estate and was rumored to do the sameOriginally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Originally posted by eek View PostAs other said, just because others did it doesn't make it right.
And it does seem to be that because they are middle class, social services treated them differently from someone who lived in a council estate and was rumored to do the same
You might not think leaving kids unattended is a good idea. (It's not)
You go on holiday.
You're going out to dinner. Your kids have a bedtime routine and will be grumpy and horrible if you keep them up late. You've had a relaxing day. The resort feels safe. Your guard is down.
Everyone at that resort leaves their kids and checks up on them. Nothing bad has ever happened to those kids.
Your friends are leaving their kids and checking up on them. You can see your room from the restaurant, so it feels close by.
You're not sure about it. "It'll be fine," says friend1. "Everyone does it," says friend2. "Don't be so over-protective," says friend3, "We'll check on them every half hour or so".
Peer pressure. You're an overprotective, neurotic parent if you sit in your flat while your friends are enjoying a meal.
Still 100% sure you would never have done it?
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment