• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Salmond "We can take Scotland in two weeks"

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    [QUOTE=DodgyAgent;1988913]
    Originally posted by Batcher View Post
    You're falling into the same trap that the LibLabCons MPs are - this isn't about the nationalists/separatists/etc. This is a movement by the people of Scotland.

    “A map of the world that does not include Utopia is not worth even glancing at, for it leaves out the one country at which Humanity is always landing. And when Humanity lands there, it looks out, and, seeing a better country, sets sail. Progress is the realisation of Utopias.”
    ― Oscar Wilde[/QUOTE

    All of the people of Scotland?
    Everyone who has a vote in the referendum. At the last count, 30% of Scottish Labour voters are voting Yes.

    Comment


      Originally posted by original PM View Post
      can anyone explain in simple terms what the main benefit the scots will get out of an independent Scotland?

      is it just that they 'don't want to be ruled by Westminster?'
      Isn't that enough?

      The feeling is that we are not represented by the Westminster system and are treated as a colony for collecting taxes.

      And lots more besides.

      Comment


        Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
        You just reminded me an independent Scotland would have to go around the world and start their own embassies. That's quite expensive especially in some countries........
        No. The assets get split. Sensible probably to share the buildings at least at first. Scotland would have representation in many fewer countries so it should all work out.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Batcher View Post
          Everyone who has a vote in the referendum. At the last count, 30% of Scottish Labour voters are voting Yes.
          Why wouldn't they? They've been promised a socialist utopia, and they've voted Labour since the dawn of time... Never under estimate just how poorly educated the average Labour voter is in Scotland.
          Error 404: Signature not found.

          Comment


            Originally posted by TestMangler View Post
            I'm not struggling to see through the blue mist at all. I was just trying to lead you towards saying some of the things youn just said above :-)

            So, if we rise above the '**** off, you're a bunch of subsidy junkies' AND the 'We'll keep our oil and you'll be ****ed' brigade, and look at this sensibly........

            Scotland CAN keep the pound (either by currency union or the panama model). England is (I think) Scotland's biggest export market and Scotland (i think) is England's second biggest export market, so, bearing in mind that and the balance of payments issues and GDP Vs debt issues, is the UK government not currently taking a piss on it's own birthday cake with the 'Definitely no currency union' stance, as a currency union, with terms agreed by both countries, not as much in the interests of rUK as it is for Scotland ? For a start, it would quell some market fears.
            From what I understand Scotland would not be allowed to keep the pound. This will presumably mean that the Scottish banks will rlocate to the UK and leave Scotland having to start their own currency.
            Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

            Comment


              Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
              I don't understand why Scottish people who want independence don't want their own Scottish pound with their own Central Bank to control interest rates that suit Scottish monetary policy.

              If you want a currency union then the Bank of England would simply ignore any Scottish problems and put interest rates at a level that suit the monetary policy of the rest of the UK.
              You mean like they do just now? Housing prices in the north of England and Scotland are still pretty low after 2008 yet London has a pricing bubble yet again and there is talk of raising interest rates to cool it down. That would have a terrible effect on houseowners in the north but who cares as long as Londoners are ok?

              Comment


                Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                No. The assets get split. Sensible probably to share the buildings at least at first. Scotland would have representation in many fewer countries so it should all work out.
                8.3% of the current UK's population lives in Scotland so the assets could get split but the rUK would get the vast majority of them.
                "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                Comment


                  Originally posted by TestMangler View Post
                  I'm not struggling to see through the blue mist at all. I was just trying to lead you towards saying some of the things youn just said above :-)

                  So, if we rise above the '**** off, you're a bunch of subsidy junkies' AND the 'We'll keep our oil and you'll be ****ed' brigade, and look at this sensibly........

                  Scotland CAN keep the pound (either by currency union or the panama model). England is (I think) Scotland's biggest export market and Scotland (i think) is England's second biggest export market, so, bearing in mind that and the balance of payments issues and GDP Vs debt issues, is the UK government not currently taking a piss on it's own birthday cake with the 'Definitely no currency union' stance, as a currency union, with terms agreed by both countries, not as much in the interests of rUK as it is for Scotland ? For a start, it would quell some market fears.
                  How certain are you that the Panama model is compatible with EU membership?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Batcher View Post
                    Isn't that enough?

                    The feeling is that we are not represented by the Westminster system and are treated as a colony for collecting taxes.

                    And lots more besides.
                    I work in Westminster and I dont feel that I am properly represented.
                    Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Batcher View Post
                      You mean like they do just now? Housing prices in the north of England and Scotland are still pretty low after 2008 yet London has a pricing bubble yet again and there is talk of raising interest rates to cool it down. That would have a terrible effect on houseowners in the north but who cares as long as Londoners are ok?
                      Exactly.
                      "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X