In any case, am I the only one who, if I thought that a contract had definitely moved inside IR35, would just let my accountant know and see it out to the end of the contract?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
IR35 again
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Bunk View PostIn any case, am I the only one who, if I thought that a contract had definitely moved inside IR35, would just let my accountant know and see it out to the end of the contract?merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by Bunk View PostIn any case, am I the only one who, if I thought that a contract had definitely moved inside IR35, would just let my accountant know and see it out to the end of the contract?
Since there are too many unknowns (not even factoring in the chance of being investigated), I wouldn't let the tax dog wag the business tail - I have PCG+ to help with the investigation, and I have TLS from Qdos to do the investigation and fund any losses that arise.
To be fair, Suity wasn't offered the chance to complete the contract.Comment
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostIf I suspect that the contract is inside IR35, then I'd put more money into the pension pot, put more money to one side, and keep on billing.
Since there are too many unknowns (not even factoring in the chance of being investigated), I wouldn't let the tax dog wag the business tail - I have PCG+ to help with the investigation, and I have TLS from Qdos to do the investigation and fund any losses that arise.
To be fair, Suity wasn't offered the chance to complete the contract.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostReferences?
HTHKnock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
-
Originally posted by suityou01 View PostThe information regarding HMRC case law is freely available on their web site. I suggest using google though.
HTH
So could you post the bits you believe are relevant otherwise we will have to treat you as the hopeless, whining, panicking clueless ous muppet you appear to be.
And continue to take the mickey out of every post you make....merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by suityou01 View PostThe information regarding HMRC case law is freely available on their web site. I suggest using google though.
HTH
Since you and your lawyer have made the assertion, it would be nice to have some facts to back that up.Comment
-
...
Originally posted by suityou01 View PostThe information regarding HMRC case law is freely available on their web site. I suggest using google though.
HTH
I am tired of following up every mythical misconception posted on the internet just to check that I haven't missed anything. To be fair, it's not only you, many commentators ostensibly qualified to comment on this stuff make blatant mistakes when it comes to reporting or purposely cloud the waters for their own ends.
So point us to the object of your concern that you have painstakingly researched. Clearly, you have a headstart on us all so please do the needful and link it, there's a good chap!Comment
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostIf I suspect that the contract is inside IR35, then I'd put more money into the pension pot, put more money to one side, and keep on billing.
Since there are too many unknowns (not even factoring in the chance of being investigated), I wouldn't let the tax dog wag the business tail - I have PCG+ to help with the investigation, and I have TLS from Qdos to do the investigation and fund any losses that arise.
To be fair, Suity wasn't offered the chance to complete the contract.Comment
-
The insurance is an interesting thing. It's quite unique. Being insured against being investigated.
I think the attitude on here is complacent and arrogant.
It's like being insured against being investigated by the police for traffic offences and then deliberately running red lights.Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment