• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Does anyone remember the Conservative Party?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Originally posted by LazyFan View Post
    Maggie upset them with the Poll tax which they have never forgiven her for. Whilst many Tories still love this TAX, they forget on purpose, it was the most unpopular tax in history (from the anti-tax party) and caused riots even in England. Some Tories even blame this on Scottish tories. As if somehow they made Maggie, the Lady not for Turning do it. As we know this sowed the seeds of the escalation of the Indi movement which at that stage was more like the Cornish Indi non-entity.

    At the height of Maggies powers it was also claimed she saved Britain the Sick Man of Europe. Due to all those evil Unions. But if we lose the Scots, who is next? The Welsh (real saxons), The Cornish? Maggie did not save Britain if she ends up being so divisive that it splits up.
    That's the point none can say she saved it, if it no longer exists due to her upsetting any part of it enough to leave.

    I also note that you have selective patriotism. I am British and wish to remain so, if that is part of the UK then all the better. Also many foreigners rich or poor value Britishness even if you don't. If that is your view, please leave the country and go and live in Malaga with the other little Englanders.
    Not sure you can blame Maggie for Scots wish for independence - according to Wikki it's been going on since the year dot List of battles between Scotland and England - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Connect with me on LinkedIn

    Follow us on Twitter.

    ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by zeitghost
      Er, neither of those are "saxons", they're celts.

      FFS don't call a Cymro a saxon, he'll get a tad upset.
      Confused surely more than upset, if you want to reall upset them call them an anglo saxon
      Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

      No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

      Comment


        #53
        Originally posted by zeitghost
        Er, neither of those are "saxons", they're celts.

        FFS don't call a Cymro a saxon, he'll get a tad upset.
        The English are really Anglo-Celtic, as are many Welsh and Scots.

        Comment


          #54
          Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
          Confused surely more than upset, if you want to reall upset them call them an anglo saxon
          Why not stick with 'ugly thick ****'. It works for members of all ethnic groups, so it's much easier to remember just one term.

          Comment


            #55
            Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
            The English are really Anglo-Celtic, as are many Welsh and Scots.
            Some of us don't really give a tulip.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #56
              Originally posted by LazyFan View Post
              Maggie upset them with the Poll tax which they have never forgiven her for. Whilst many Tories still love this TAX, they forget on purpose, it was the most unpopular tax in history (from the anti-tax party) and caused riots even in England. Some Tories even blame this on Scottish tories. As if somehow they made Maggie, the Lady not for Turning do it. As we know this sowed the seeds of the escalation of the Indi movement which at that stage was more like the Cornish Indi non-entity.

              At the height of Maggies powers it was also claimed she saved Britain the Sick Man of Europe. Due to all those evil Unions. But if we lose the Scots, who is next? The Welsh (real saxons), The Cornish? Maggie did not save Britain if she ends up being so divisive that it splits up.
              That's the point none can say she saved it, if it no longer exists due to her upsetting any part of it enough to leave.

              I also note that you have selective patriotism. I am British and wish to remain so, if that is part of the UK then all the better. Also many foreigners rich or poor value Britishness even if you don't. If that is your view, please leave the country and go and live in Malaga with the other little Englanders.
              I'm not really fussed about patriotism one way or the other; I don't believe in forced political unions, however, and if the Scots wish to be on their merry way, so be it, particularly if it results in a rightward shift in England's politics. They can still trade with England and get their chance to implement a more interventionist state, until it collapses without being subsidised.

              The fact that some people value forced unions is their issue, not mine, and I can certainly support movements that wish to break these apart without having to 'leave' anywhere. Although there's plenty of nice places elsewhere in the world that I am considering if this country does not shape up economically. So I may yet do that, whilst this country degenerates into an overtaxed patch of misery. I remain optimistic about its prospects for now but we'll see what the next general election brings in.
              Last edited by Zero Liability; 14 August 2014, 11:38.

              Comment


                #57
                many of the 'poll tax rioters' were actually just rent a mob students who had been bused in from all over the country on the promise of 4 cans of cider and ten B&H.

                Comment


                  #58
                  Originally posted by original PM View Post
                  many of the 'poll tax rioters' were actually just rent a mob students who had been bused in from all over the country on the promise of 4 cans of cider and ten B&H.
                  Who funded this and what was the overall cost to the funders?

                  Comment


                    #59
                    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                    Who funded this and what was the overall cost to the funders?
                    well 4 cans of cider back then probably cost about £1.50 and ten B&H was again about the same

                    so £3 per person + transport at say £5 per head

                    assume 2000 'rioters'

                    so thats 2000*8 = £16,000

                    Comment


                      #60
                      Originally posted by Zero Liability View Post
                      I'm not really fussed about patriotism one way or the other; I don't believe in forced political unions, however, and if the Scots wish to be on their merry way, so be it, particularly if it results in a rightward shift in England's politics. They can still trade with England and get their chance to implement a more interventionist state, until it collapses without being subsidised.

                      The fact that some people value forced unions is their issue, not mine, and I can certainly support movements that wish to break these apart without having to 'leave' anywhere. Although there's plenty of nice places elsewhere in the world that I am considering if this country does not shape up economically. So I may yet do that, whilst this country degenerates into an overtaxed patch of misery. I remain optimistic about its prospects for now but we'll see what the next general election brings in.
                      Czechoslovakia managed it without any bloodletting or overdone resentment, so separations can happen

                      Whether it economically makes sense though is another matter
                      Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

                      No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X