Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Where do you think Wahabi/ISIS extremism comes from then? Thin Air? It needs serious bucks behind it and Saudi has exactly that. The Wahabi mosques in Europe are paid for by whom?
So you feel that would be sufficient for Saudi Arabia to sanction an attack on a major ally?
An interesting theory.
Old Greg - In search of acceptance since Mar 2007. Hoping each leap will be his last.
So you feel that would be sufficient for Saudi Arabia to sanction an attack on a major ally?
An interesting theory.
What don't you get about what I have said? Whether it was directly or indirectly sanctioned by the state, the bent ideology and extremism came from Saudi. Then the US goes and bombs Afghanistan and Iraq. What does that tell you about the West? No Theory is involved- just plain logic.
For a moment, let's put those questions on hold if we may.
What were Saudi Arabia's motives for instigating the "9/11" attacks against the United States?
Let's not put the questions on hold. You were the one who said that you thought that Iran was probably involved, but provided no evidence.
So far, it's been pointed out to you that none of the bombers involved in "9/11" were from Iran, Iraq or Afghanistan, yet you feel those countries are somehow responsible, whereas the one country where most of the bombers came from is obviously not guilty because they must be.
Let's not put the questions on hold. You were the one who said that you thought that Iran was probably involved, but provided no evidence.
So far, it's been pointed out to you that none of the bombers involved in "9/11" were from Iran, Iraq or Afghanistan, yet you feel those countries are somehow responsible, whereas the one country where most of the bombers came from is obviously not guilty because they must be.
Yeah cos 90% of the bombers were Saudi, surely it's not Saudi that's involved!
Yeah cos 90% of the bombers were Saudi, surely it's not Saudi that's involved!
I mean, why would a supplier be very happy if one of their customers blamed other suppliers apart from them?
Increase your market share, get your customers to support you, blame others and you come out of it smelling of roses. OK, so one of your customers might have lost a few lives and maybe lost a bit of cash, but they still come back for more.
Nope, can't think of any reason why they'd not be complaining about their business increasing. Can you?
Source? Are these the EFPs that are made in Iraq, based on 1980s designs that came from Iran?
Well if one makes EFP in Iraq under direction and training, plus clever triggers from Iran, which wasn’t exactly top secret , then it makes Iran responsible since it was done by Quds Force run by Suleimani.
He should have been taken out 15 years ago - a lot of people all around the world (especially in Syria, Yemen) woukd still be alive now.
Whatever he says, the opposite tends to be the truth. The best they can come up with is "Militias linked to Iran".
It was established 15 years ago, Bush even considered hitting targets inside Iran.
Iran never really hid well taking part in getting EFPs to kill UK/US troops, daring for response which never came - as the result they expanded to Syria, Yemen, And big part of Iraq.
Comment