World war 3 now imminent

[DoctorStrangelove]

What planet were you born on?

Pot.

Kettle.

Black.

[DoctorStrangelove]

Here we go again.

Another 40 dead in a crush.

I suppose that's the Septics fault too.

[AtW]

Notice - I gave him two links to news sources he considered ok: BBC and the Guardian, but he ignored those...

[WTFH]

Notice - I gave him two links to news sources he considered ok: BBC and the Guardian, but he ignored those...

And I gave you 4 links, but you ignored them.

[AtW]

If you actually cared about the people in Yemen and cared about where weapons were made, you'd maybe not have mentioned them.

The UK has made 10 times more in arms sales to Saudi Arabia than it's given in aid to Yemen | The Independent

The truth about UK arms deals with Saudi Arabia | The Week UK

‘Toxic, damaging & shameful’: Fury as UK and Saudi Arabia sign huge arms deal — RT UK News


And if you don't like those sources, what about the Torygraph?
BAE Systems: timeline of bribery allegations - Telegraph

Why won’t you find links about Russia selling weapons to Iran, Syria, Lybia? Countries that are under UN embargoes, unlike Saudi Arabia.

The reason people get killed in Yemen is not because SA got UK weapons, but because Iran supports actively war there - on border with Saudi Arabia, so what do you expect Saudi Arabia to do - roll over and have Iranian missiles within range of oil facilities? If Saudi Arabia shuts down price of oil will be 200 bucks or more, and if Iran stops oil production - then it’s their own internal problem, which is between the people or Iran and ayatollahs

[WTFH]

Thanks.

Personal opinion - I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out that he did have a hand in it - causing that kind of mischief would fall within his remit I would suggest.

I did not say that Iran was probably involved.

...

If we're going to have a debate let's be honest about it.

Correct, I apologise, you said you wouldn't be surprised if he (head of the Quds force, the overseas branch of the Revolutionary Guards.) had a hand in it.

You didn't use the word "probably", but I "wouldn't be surprised" if that was implied.

What I did do was ask "what would be the motive for a Saudi Arabia sanctioned attack on one of its major allies?".

If we're going to have a debate let's be honest about it.

I answered that later on. Saudi does not have "allies" it has customers and suppliers that it likes to do deals with.

[AtW]

And I gave you 4 links, but you ignored them.

I did not ask for them (unlike him)

[NorthWestPerm2Contr]

I have pretty good idea how Middle East works - they only respect force, overwhelming force and only because they have to.

Yes because they are hot blood arabs and Muslims so the only way to deal with them is like the savages that they are. Been reading too much Daily Mail?

[LondonManc]

Special forces find proof of Iran supplying Taliban with equipment to fight British | UK news | The Guardian

BBC NEWS | World | Middle East | Iran 'behind attacks on British'

People got short memories - it was clear case back then, just nobody wanted to do anything to Iran after disaster of Iraq

Check. Mate.

[NorthWestPerm2Contr]

Notice - I gave him two links to news sources he considered ok: BBC and the Guardian, but he ignored those...

Don't have any issues with the posts. They are only reporting news and in both cases no major issue. The real problem in the middle east has always been foreign interference.