Originally posted by Cliphead
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
So just had a call...
Collapse
X
-
-
Awful stuff. I know some pubs in Lanarkshire that have it on opticsOriginally posted by stek View PostDuty on Bucky if you vote Yes!
Comment
-
It does now. Up to £5K, I believe.Originally posted by mudskipper View PostDamn.
Are you a PCG+ member? I know it covers for agents going bust, not sure about clients direct?
Course, no help if you ain't joined...
Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
5K?Originally posted by malvolio View PostIt does now. Up to £5K, I believe.
Course, no help if you ain't joined...
I'll miss out on a weekend in the pub
Comment
-
Holy Moley.
thats bad for you CH , but what about them poor permies ?
it will ruin their year
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
It really will, some are on just minimum wage.Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostHoly Moley.
thats bad for you CH , but what about them poor permies ?
it will ruin their year
Comment
-
If they bring in an administrator my understanding is that permie salary is the last to get paid with HMG first and then B2B second.Originally posted by Cliphead View PostClientCo do have some money that Hector wants but they're planning on paying what they can to permies although not a full month's wages, I'm last in the queue except for maybe the landlord who owns the building so not holding my breath.
Chalk this one down to experience. Again.
There's gonna be tears for souvenirs tomorrow when the permies turn up to the news.
Client Risk Test? Fck Hector, 30+ years in this game and no issues ever
Comment
-
Secured creditors (like banks holding a mortgage) get paid first. Preferential creditors, like employees, get paid after that. Unsecured creditors get paid last.
Somewhere in the mix are the fees paid to the receiver and HMG. They're definitely before employees, but not sure about secured creditors.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Thanks for clarifyingOriginally posted by NotAllThere View PostSecured creditors (like banks holding a mortgage) get paid first. Preferential creditors, like employees, get paid after that. Unsecured creditors get paid last.
Somewhere in the mix are the fees paid to the receiver and HMG. They're definitely before employees, but not sure about secured creditors.Comment
-
Be careful that they do indeed belong to you.Originally posted by Cliphead View PostHere's a thing. Since they didn't have a clue they asked me to register several domain names and hosting which I did and paid for and have not been reimbursed, I presume I own them now? Probably useless but...
In the absence of information otherwise the receivers will probably assume they are a company asset and therefore theirs to do with what they wish. In this case you'll be down as an unsecured creditor on what they cost.
Your call: let the receiver know you control the domain names or write their cost off with the other moneys owed.Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment