Originally posted by northernladuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
5 days into contract, rate cut!
Collapse
X
-
Indeed. This is why big supplier companies front load their costs into a contract, because they know they are going to be asked to reduce them in the future. They need to make sure they get a return on the contract that covers setup and development in the first 2 years because their margins will be cut every year after that. It's a balancing act for them in terms of making money on the contract and keeping the customer happy so they don't go elsewhere in search of a better deal."Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife. -
Bank and Public Sector are sheep with this. One goes, the others then follow.
Some good advice earlier in the thread - with these sectors, revenge is a dish best served by adding on 10% next time.Comment
-
I agree - so the only time they should be allowed to do it as at the end of a contract (ie the same time we can ask for a rate increase). Its a sham that they get away with it but as so many just bend over and take it, it will continue to happen. If everyone just walked they'd change their mind. But people lose their bottle as they think they wont find other contracts (or get black balled)Originally posted by northernladuk View PostBut they do. Maybe not a cut out of the blue or a change midway through but a lot of clients push for a year on year reduction in the cost of the service from big companies like this. I know my last clients did and the year on year target was more than 10% so they do push the big guys for cuts, even more regularly than contractors.Comment
-
It's not about losing their bottle. It's about making a business decision based on the current circumstances.Originally posted by Underscore Pt2 View PostI agree - so the only time they should be allowed to do it as at the end of a contract (ie the same time we can ask for a rate increase). Its a sham that they get away with it but as so many just bend over and take it, it will continue to happen. If everyone just walked they'd change their mind. But people lose their bottle as they think they wont find other contracts (or get black balled)'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Why wouldn't you add the 10% anyway if you can get away with it?Originally posted by 7specialgems View PostBank and Public Sector are sheep with this. One goes, the others then follow.
Some good advice earlier in the thread - with these sectors, revenge is a dish best served by adding on 10% next time.The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment