[QUOTE=SarahL2012;1874263]I've only done it once and that's when it was obvious at the interview that the responsibilities of the role were way, way higher than what the agent had described.
Luckily the client had realised the same thing and when the agent went back to them they'd already got internal approval to increase the rate.QUOTE]
Yep, I'd go with this scenario.
Sometimes the role is under-egged (tactic maybe on their part - client/agent - what can we get for 2&6?), and you don't find out until interview time, or in some cases, a while after being in the role. So, if under-egging can be identified at interview, and you get the offer, go for the rate increase at this stage.
Failing that, take the role (if say a short term 3-monther), get your feet under the table, and then fully justify the increase at renewal to both client and agent.
No agreement; leave and provide reasons. This way is better than no work at all in my book.
Luckily the client had realised the same thing and when the agent went back to them they'd already got internal approval to increase the rate.QUOTE]
Yep, I'd go with this scenario.
Sometimes the role is under-egged (tactic maybe on their part - client/agent - what can we get for 2&6?), and you don't find out until interview time, or in some cases, a while after being in the role. So, if under-egging can be identified at interview, and you get the offer, go for the rate increase at this stage.
Failing that, take the role (if say a short term 3-monther), get your feet under the table, and then fully justify the increase at renewal to both client and agent.
No agreement; leave and provide reasons. This way is better than no work at all in my book.

Comment