Hi all. I've been contracting for around 18 months, and although work has occasionally been hit and miss it has generally been an improvement over the usual 9-5 life.
However, some months ago I suffered a mild stroke. I managed to complete the contract I was on satisfactorily but needed to take a recovery break after that. Now I'm raring to get back to it, there is little work available (my industry is very cyclical and I've missed the boat on the current round of jobs).
There's the chance of a fixed term contract at a company which is due to run from Now (November) until March with the possibility of an extra 12 months for maternity cover.
My question is, is there a good case I can give to the employer to hire me on a contract through my company rather than taking me on as a temporary employee? This would be my preference but I don't know the pros and cons from their side.
Many thanks.
However, some months ago I suffered a mild stroke. I managed to complete the contract I was on satisfactorily but needed to take a recovery break after that. Now I'm raring to get back to it, there is little work available (my industry is very cyclical and I've missed the boat on the current round of jobs).
There's the chance of a fixed term contract at a company which is due to run from Now (November) until March with the possibility of an extra 12 months for maternity cover.
My question is, is there a good case I can give to the employer to hire me on a contract through my company rather than taking me on as a temporary employee? This would be my preference but I don't know the pros and cons from their side.
Many thanks.
Comment