• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

IR35 - No MOO or client control

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by aoxomoxoa View Post
    Hi Lisa, it was Bracken asking for an opinion and I was obliging with one
    I knew that, just testing
    Connect with me on LinkedIn

    Follow us on Twitter.

    ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

    Comment


      #12
      Nevertheless, the test is "Direction and Control". If the client says "Do this in the best way you can" that's not D&C. If the client says "Do this , this way, to achieve this result", it is. "Do not come in on these days so that we don't have to pay you" fits the second case, not the first. Does that override the Mutuality aspect? To Hector's eyes, probably not, it is still evidence of control and the lack of pay is a desired outcome, not a consequence.

      Hence, get your position in first: "I'm not in on these days and won't be billing you for them". If it happens to align to what the client wants to happen that's a bonus - but it's your decision.

      And the really sensible thing to do is to book out the Christmas period well in advance. You can always agree to change that if the client needs you...
      Blog? What blog...?

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by malvolio View Post
        Nevertheless, the test is "Direction and Control". If the client says "Do this in the best way you can" that's not D&C. If the client says "Do this , this way, to achieve this result", it is. "Do not come in on these days so that we don't have to pay you" fits the second case, not the first. Does that override the Mutuality aspect? To Hector's eyes, probably not, it is still evidence of control and the lack of pay is a desired outcome, not a consequence.

        Hence, get your position in first: "I'm not in on these days and won't be billing you for them". If it happens to align to what the client wants to happen that's a bonus - but it's your decision.

        And the really sensible thing to do is to book out the Christmas period well in advance. You can always agree to change that if the client needs you...
        Doesn't that apply only if ALL the contractors do this - won't HMRC pickup on the inconsistent client behaviour towards contractors?
        This default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernames

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by MPwannadecentincome View Post
          Doesn't that apply only if ALL the contractors do this - won't HMRC pickup on the inconsistent client behaviour towards contractors?
          Not really. You are only one contractor and Hector will only be looking at your contractual arrangements. If others want to screw up their status, that's their problem, but it has no impact on or relevance to your case.
          Blog? What blog...?

          Comment

          Working...
          X