Originally posted by TheFaQQer
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Contracting direct with Company
Collapse
X
-
The only time I went direct (except for one or two very small pieces of work done on an email and a handshake) was with a client who had never used a direct contractor. We used the PCG template, which I said were my standard term and conditions. -
You should check whether your contract through the agent last year included an exclusivity clause, and if so how long the exclusivity period is. Otherwise you might find yourself obliged to pay the agent his cut regardless of having gone direct.Originally posted by icemancomeths View PostHi guys,
I have been offered a 3 month contract with a company that I did a 3 month contract stint with last year. Now is it a simple and respected process to do this without going through an agency?
Who draws up a contract?
Are there any negatives?
What about IR35?
Am I missing anything?
I'm pretty new to this game so any help will be massively appreciated.
I am a member of the PCG.
Thanks in advance!Comment
-
Or you might find yourself obliged to have an argument about why you're not obliged to pay the agent his cut regardless of having the clause in the contract.Originally posted by aoxomoxoa View PostYou should check whether your contract through the agent last year included an exclusivity clause, and if so how long the exclusivity period is. Otherwise you might find yourself obliged to pay the agent his cut regardless of having gone direct.Comment
-
I believe what OG may be referring to is the fact that most agents put in a standard exclusion term of 12 months, regardless of the length of the actual contract, and more often than not these would be unenforceable as they would be seen as an unreasonable restraint of trade.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostOr you might find yourself obliged to have an argument about why you're not obliged to pay the agent his cut regardless of having the clause in the contract.Comment
-
PCG forum?Originally posted by icemancomeths View Postwhere is their forum? Can't find it :/
Grab a copy of the PCG's standard template contract and get this submitted to the client ASAP. Stumping up with your own terms of business will head off them producing their own dodgy ones full of stupid clauses that you have to argue the point over.Free advice and opinions - refunds are available if you are not 100% satisfied.Comment
-
Why use the standard one when there's a fully-configured direct-to-client one?Originally posted by Wanderer View PostPCG forum?
Grab a copy of the PCG's standard template contract and get this submitted to the client ASAP. Stumping up with your own terms of business will head off them producing their own dodgy ones full of stupid clauses that you have to argue the point over.Blog? What blog...?
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Today 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Yesterday 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44

Comment