What the client has negotiated with the client and what he has negotiated with you is completely different to what you expect. If you thought you deserved more than 275 that you agreed upon, you should have demanded that scale when you started to negoatiate your day rate. If 275 was not acceptable you should have walked away. Its quite possible that the agent reckons that 275 is acceptable rate for someone with your skills and might have turned you down if you proved expensive.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Agency skimming too much???
Collapse
X
-
-
Yeah, but when 1st talking to agents about a role, if you say 275 isnt enough they likely won't put u fwd so wont get the role - so then you're looking again. Sometimes its not possible to demand, as u put it and if there's not been much of your type of work around lately then its hard to walk away. Some people are at the mercy of these lying agents.Originally posted by fullyautomatix View PostWhat the client has negotiated with the client and what he has negotiated with you is completely different to what you expect. If you thought you deserved more than 275 that you agreed upon, you should have demanded that scale when you started to negoatiate your day rate. If 275 was not acceptable you should have walked away. Its quite possible that the agent reckons that 275 is acceptable rate for someone with your skills and might have turned you down if you proved expensive.
To then get confirmation that the fkrs have lied to the tune of 100 quids cuts a bit deep. I'd be well dis-chuffed. Only option u have is to wait for renewal time now tho.Comment
-
I'm not sure how effective letting the client know the agent's % would be.
IMO, the client is much more likely to haggle the agent down, which could end up with your rate being dropped.
Much better just to try and squeeze the agent's margin and leave the client out of it (but then, the agent could go to the client asking for more!)Contracting: more of the money, less of the sh1tComment
-
It depends on the client.Originally posted by kingcook View PostI'm not sure how effective letting the client know the agent's % would be.
IMO, the client is much more likely to haggle the agent down, which could end up with your rate being dropped.
Some clients know agencies are creaming it and I know both contractors and permanent staff, who have made sure agencies have been dropped due to these tricks. If they are paying the agency x a day, they expect to get a person with the right level of experience with the agency taking a reasonable margin.
The client also doesn't expect to have to scan 30 CVs per role and do 10 interviews* per role just because the agency has cut what they are paying out to the contractor so no-one with the right level of experience applies.
*Sometimes agencies will change CVs not just format them."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
I really wish you could see what the agent is skimming. I know that all that matters is what you are getting. But given the size of the figures there's a lot of margin for the agent to take the piss.Comment
-
He isn't. You are.Originally posted by Robinho View PostI really wish you could see what the agent is skimming.
Yes, dur... You want more, negotiate harder.I know that all that matters is what you are getting.
To which the answer is bleedin' obvious. All you have to do is win your own business.But given the size of the figures there's a lot of margin for the agent to take the piss.Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
Help! Dodgy has stolen Mal's loginOriginally posted by malvolio View PostHe isn't. You are.
Yes, dur... You want more, negotiate harder.
To which the answer is bleedin' obvious. All you have to do is win your own business.
Job motivation: how the powerful steal from the stupid.Comment
-
You noticed...Originally posted by Ignis Fatuus View PostHelp! Dodgy has stolen Mal's login

I don't like agencies adn the ir current business model only serves agencies, bobody else. But the point is that if you're going to negotiate with an agent, it's a good idea to understand his business drivers. That way you can counter his main arguement, that you cost money to support. You do, but you cost a lot lesss once the business is won and the first contract completed, at which point he's recovered his investment cost and you are simply a revenue generator. He can't then justify the same margin since there is no cost recovery needed any more.
And the OP's knowledge of the numbers and peiods involved means he can work out exactly by how much the agency can afford increase the OP's rate.
Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
Calm down dear, you're not telling me anything i don't know.Originally posted by malvolio View PostHe isn't. You are.
Yes, dur... You want more, negotiate harder.
To which the answer is bleedin' obvious. All you have to do is win your own business.
I am saying is that a lack of "perfect information" can distort the market forces in favour of the agent, that is all. i am more than happy with what i earn.Comment
-
You gotta a cold Mal?Originally posted by malvolio View PostI don't like agencies adn the ir current business model only serves agencies, bobody else.Clarity is everythingComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment