Expenses NOT included

[NotAllThere]

"piddles"

[BolshieBastard]

This thread is funnier than Ricky Gervais at the Golden Globes!

[b0redom]

It's not quite that dumb.

A contract may well have a clause that is unenforceable and/or not legal. If a contract dispute gets to court, then such a clause will be struck out. If there enough, then the entire contract can be void.

Yes, but does this appear to be the case here (and is pretty unlikely to be the case in most situations). It seems to me that it's more likely someone just being dumb?

[SueEllen]

Yes, but does this appear to be the case here (and is pretty unlikely to be the case in most situations). It seems to me that it's more likely someone just being dumb?

The person is just "uninformed" not "dumb" as if they weren't they would realise in situations where a written contract follows a verbal agreement, unless it can be proved otherwise the written contract will take precedence. Mainly because people don't remember facts correctly.