Originally posted by Poker space
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Opt out of Conduct of employment agencies 2003 act?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Blog? What blog...? -
Originally posted by kal View PostIs it really worth walking away from a contract for something like this, I would say no. Agree its not cricket but its the real world we all live in...
Of course, if everyone stuck up for it then it'd work but the trouble is agencies know most contractors wont. In fact, is there any evidence that anything has ever been done about an agency that has been reported in this way?Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostYour call, but that doesn't actually prevent you shopping them to the EAI team. Also, your opt out is almost certainly invalid anyway.
Sign up with opt out then time it so a letter arrives on the day the new gig starts. They're hardly going to pull you from the client are they?
Might upset them a bith though but it'd be fun.Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostYeah well, the one sure way to make sure nothing happens is to do nothing. some of us prefer to take action and if more people understood the rules and the remedies available to them, we wouldn't be in this mess in the first place. But until contracting is no longer driven by amateurs on one side and charlatans on the other, nothing will change.
They've not succeeded in getting any worthwhile change regarding security clearance fiasco and you / they won't with this. There's now too much vested interest and clap trap by agencies.I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!Comment
-
Hi,
I have basically understood that by not opting out there should be no IR35 implications and that the third party agent cannot withhold any money.
In my situation (just recently got offer of a new contract - first timer), the agent is a direct recuriter of the client (internal HR dealing with contracts), do the same rules apply? do i still decide not to opt out?
ThanksComment
-
...
Originally posted by Daplayer321 View PostHi,
I have basically understood that by not opting out there should be no IR35 implications and that the third party agent cannot withhold any money.
In my situation (just recently got offer of a new contract - first timer), the agent is a direct recuriter of the client (internal HR dealing with contracts), do the same rules apply? do i still decide not to opt out?
Thanks
If the contract arrangement is YourCo -> agent -> Client then yes the regulations apply and you can either opt out or ignore it and be not opted out - there is actually no such thing as opted in even though that is the effect of not opting out.
If the contract arrangement is YourCo -> Client then the regulations can not apply and are irrelevant in your circumstances.Comment
-
Originally posted by Daplayer321 View PostIn my situation (just recently got offer of a new contract - first timer), the agent is a direct recuriter of the client (internal HR dealing with contracts), do the same rules apply? do i still decide not to opt out?
If the client has a separate agency (for example Steria Recruitment), then they would be acting as an EB or EA so the regulations could apply.
From what you say, it's the former rather than the latter in your case, though. I suggest that you really, really need to work this out (it's been pointed out in your other thread) before you get too deep.Comment
-
Opting out & BET
If I understand correctly, the main benefits of not opting out are:-
- Guaranteed payment from Agency, even if the Client does not pay
- Restrictions on working for the end client after the end of the contract limited to 8 weeks.
I know the BETs are being scrapped come April 15, but they are still being used right now. One of the BETs is about whether you have ever lost any money (not been paid).
As such, would opting in have any affect on the strength of IR35 (as per the BETs).
For me, I am far more concerned about tax implications and IR35 status than staying opted in for benefits which I can't a high chance of me ever invoking.Comment
-
Originally posted by youngguy View PostIf I understand correctly, the main benefits of not opting out are:-
- Guaranteed payment from Agency, even if the Client does not pay
- Restrictions on working for the end client after the end of the contract limited to 8 weeks.
I know the BETs are being scrapped come April 15, but they are still being used right now. One of the BETs is about whether you have ever lost any money (not been paid).
As such, would opting in have any affect on the strength of IR35 (as per the BETs).
For me, I am far more concerned about tax implications and IR35 status than staying opted in for benefits which I can't a high chance of me ever invoking.
Opting out of the agency regulations MIGHT increase the chances of you not being paid, and in that event, then it would give you some more points, so could shut down the investigation early.
However, IMHO, the potential costs to your business of opting out of the agency regulations and not being paid do not outweigh the benefits. The impact on IR35 is negligible at best, so I cannot understand why people would want to sign away the right to be paid money that you are owed.
If there was an IR35 investigation and you weren't low risk, then your opt out status would have no bearing on any of the three pillars of an IR35 case.Comment
-
Originally posted by youngguy View PostIf I understand correctly, the main benefits of not opting out are:-
- Guaranteed payment from Agency, even if the Client does not pay
If opted-out you can still do all that... obviously more of a challenge and possibly involving the client too.
A real business would be doing what it could to protect its revenue, not chasing a silly points-based system.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors, don’t be fooled by HMRC Spotlight 67 on MSCs Today 09:20
- HMRC warns IT consultants and others of 12 ‘payroll entities’ Yesterday 09:15
- How you think you look on LinkedIn vs what recruiters see Dec 2 09:00
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
Comment