• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

sc clearance

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    Which does of course directly go against Cabinet Office guidelines.
    Like any agent actually gives a monkeys about the Cabinet Office guidelines, unfortunately for us.

    Comment


      #12
      I once worked on a contract where SC clearance was required, but my clearance didn't come through in the six months duration of the contract. So I had to seek out and ask to be escorted in and out of the site each day.

      What is checked anyway? Criminal records and places you've worked in the last n years?

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
        What is checked anyway?
        See the Security Clearance Q & A sticky.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Mr.Whippy View Post
          Like any agent actually gives a monkeys about the Cabinet Office guidelines, unfortunately for us.
          To be fair, the agents are only doing what the client is demanding....
          Free advice and opinions - refunds are available if you are not 100% satisfied.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Wanderer View Post
            To be fair, the agents are only doing what the client is demanding....
            Probably true in most cases, but I've also been working somewhere that was looking for people and would accept very skilled, non-cleared people because they could work on site whilst SC was in progress without having to be escorted.

            I knew someone who applied for the role and gave a recommendation to the client so they were expecting his CV, despite him not being cleared. He applied and had a long conversation with the agent which ended up in the usual "the client wants only cleared people so I'm not going to submit your CV".... I mentioned this to client who in the end had to call the agent and tell them they wanted his CV and he got the role & subsequently cleared. The agent clearly thought his best chance of securing his margin over another agency was only submitting cleared people.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Wanderer View Post
              To be fair, the agents are only doing what the client is demanding....
              Exactly - the Cabinet office don't pay the bill......

              I'm not saying that it's right, or that it shouldn't be different, I just wanted to give you a view on what actually happens.

              The reality is that if you have clearance already, and are 90% of the perfect candidate who doesn't have clearance, then you'd be offered the role - better to have 90% covered, than risk someone not getting clearance, or a delay in the process. At the very route of the problem, are the tight timescales dictated by the nature of government/MOD projects, and the drive for Value for Money - the risk of someone who can't start, or needs to be escorted, is very high, especially in a project or programme which is already in flight. It can put back timescales, and will ultimately cost huge amounts of money.

              Unfortunately, the above "urgency" seems to be applied to all roles with security clearance involved - which is where the fundamental problem lays within the recruitment industry - ultimately this comes down to PROPERLY qualifying the contract.
              "Being a permy is like being married, when there's no more sex on the cards....and she's got fat."
              SlimRick

              Can't argue with that

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by The Agents View View Post
                Exactly - the Cabinet office don't pay the bill......

                I'm not saying that it's right, or that it shouldn't be different, I just wanted to give you a view on what actually happens.

                The reality is that if you have clearance already, and are 90% of the perfect candidate who doesn't have clearance, then you'd be offered the role - better to have 90% covered, than risk someone not getting clearance, or a delay in the process. At the very route of the problem, are the tight timescales dictated by the nature of government/MOD projects, and the drive for Value for Money - the risk of someone who can't start, or needs to be escorted, is very high, especially in a project or programme which is already in flight. It can put back timescales, and will ultimately cost huge amounts of money.

                Unfortunately, the above "urgency" seems to be applied to all roles with security clearance involved - which is where the fundamental problem lays within the recruitment industry - ultimately this comes down to PROPERLY qualifying the contract.
                So what we need to do is speed up the clearance process considerably, isn't it...

                Ever heard of Cerberus? Although, being an HMG programme, that's been put back from its original start date of Nov 2010.
                Blog? What blog...?

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by malvolio View Post
                  So what we need to do is speed up the clearance process considerably, isn't it...

                  Ever heard of Cerberus? Although, being an HMG programme, that's been put back from its original start date of Nov 2010.
                  No doubt that's because they can't get the security cleared contractors, to make the security clearing system, more effective...... Give you the hump huh?
                  "Being a permy is like being married, when there's no more sex on the cards....and she's got fat."
                  SlimRick

                  Can't argue with that

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
                    Ever heard of Cerberus?
                    The Microsoft-only online replacement for paper clearance forms?

                    It'll be great, won't it?

                    It'll allow the DVA to outsource their data management to the Indian sub-continent, and lose DVDs of data, just like all the other government departments do.
                    My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by RichardCranium View Post
                      The Microsoft-only online replacement for paper clearance forms?
                      Why would you need it to work on anything but a Microsoft and a Linux system anyway? Apples are for people who can't use proper computers

                      It'll be great, won't it?
                      Probably not - but I wouldn't want to have to sort it out - so I guess I'll cope with it!

                      It'll allow the DVA to outsource their data management to the Indian sub-continent, and lose DVDs of data, just like all the other government departments do.
                      DVD's of data? The last one I heard of going missing was a 1tb Hard disk, full to the brim!
                      "Being a permy is like being married, when there's no more sex on the cards....and she's got fat."
                      SlimRick

                      Can't argue with that

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X