Originally posted by speling bee
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
How much do you pay your accountant...?
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by garnet View PostI am pretty sure my contract is outside ir35, and there might be a second client, which puts me completely outside.
What else do I need from him in terms of 'jsut enough operation'?Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View Post2nd contract might be outside but 1st one might be inside.The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
Originally posted by stek View PostI don't know - I use Nixon Williams as others do, they often email and even call telling me about certain legislative changes and how I will be affected and options as to what to do and what not to do. Proactive rather than reactive.
I good rule for me (as an ex-account myself!) is a good one should save his costs over the year by little advises and better ways to treat things tax-wise, you have to ask will your do that?
£700 a year is what, 10 hours of his time? Hour a month? You can bet the trainee on reception will be doing most of it and thats true with NW and others I'm sure but for me it's the proactiveness, and that NW, SJD etc are contractor-friendly and know the rules.
Only time will tell, why not give him a go?
Perhaps he is the trainee though and he just asks someone every time I ask something. LOL. :-)
No seriously, as Stek says, NW are very good at being pro-active.
Im a bit of a miserable twat and will be the first person to moan/complain if somebody screws up but Danny at NW is always spot on.Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View Post2nd contract might be outside but 1st one might be inside.
My point was - if we assume it is outside IR35, is it a good price and extent of service?
I am sure that if contract is found to be in IR35 he can/will adjust everything.Comment
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View PostYou reckon with NW? To be honest, I ALWAYS get the same guy unless he's off on leave or something. Knows his stuff too and is very helpful.
Perhaps he is the trainee though and he just asks someone every time I ask something. LOL. :-)
No seriously, as Stek says, NW are very good at being pro-active.
Im a bit of a miserable twat and will be the first person to moan/complain if somebody screws up but Danny at NW is always spot on.
Recently I've had Alan on my case cos I've not looked through the end-of-year accounts, it's this sort of badgering we contractors need (and I've got till Feb 2013!)! I'm doing it Alan, but first the dog peed on it than I left it on the bus by accident....
Lesser firms will ask once, stick it the drawer, then u get fined and it's your fault for not doing what was asked. Seriously, NW have my vote whilst the OP's choice may be good, we contractors do need to be pushed mostly....Comment
-
Originally posted by garnet View PostSure, well, the contract is now signed. You only have that much ability to change contracts when you sign up with an agency. They have other contractors working for them (some even for the same client) and no one was in. Contract contains all the outside IR35 wordings.I mentioned these to him and he also agrees it is outside IR - only time will reveal.
My point was - if we assume it is outside IR35, is it a good price and extent of service?
I am sure that if contract is found to be in IR35 he can/will adjust everything.
It's your company, you are responsible. If you believe it is outside and have taken steps to determine that it is - which you don't seem to have done but we'll let that slide - then you decide how to pay yourself. If you think it's inside, then you have to apply the rules for IR35. But whichever way you decide, it's your call, nobody else's (least of all the agent's).
Secondly if your contract and your working practices aren't fully aligned, the contratct and all its get-out-of-jail-free clauses will be ignored.
Thirdly, you will never know for certain until you have been to a Tribnunal.
Finally, your accountant does what you tell him. He can only advise. How much that advice is worth over and above his more traditional duties is only something you will be able to judge. I pay my accountant the equuivalent of three hours gross income a month and never bother them; seems like a good trade off to me. YMMV.
So given the above and your own apparent lack of knowledge on the subject, I suggest you get your next contract reviewed by someone who knows what they're doing before you sign it, and get your self some PEI protection now.
HTHBlog? What blog...?Comment
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostNot sure I understood any of that. However...
It's your company, you are responsible. If you believe it is outside and have taken steps to determine that it is - which you don't seem to have done but we'll let that slide - then you decide how to pay yourself. If you think it's inside, then you have to apply the rules for IR35. But whichever way you decide, it's your call, nobody else's (least of all the agent's).
Secondly if your contract and your working practices aren't fully aligned, the contratct and all its get-out-of-jail-free clauses will be ignored.
Thirdly, you will never know for certain until you have been to a Tribnunal.
Finally, your accountant does what you tell him. He can only advise. How much that advice is worth over and above his more traditional duties is only something you will be able to judge. I pay my accountant the equuivalent of three hours gross income a month and never bother them; seems like a good trade off to me. YMMV.
So given the above and your own apparent lack of knowledge on the subject, I suggest you get your next contract reviewed by someone who knows what they're doing before you sign it, and get your self some PEI protection now.
HTH
I just went to NW's site and used the IR35 checker. According to it I am out of IR35.
I am aware of IR35 although I am not an expert in it. And I dont need to be, as you said it takes someone who knows what they are doing. First thing this accountant asked me was 'Are you in or out of IR35?' I showed him the clauses of the contract and he agrees I am out. As does the NW's tool. I consider this safe enough, and still as you said, you never know until you have been to a tribunal.
While all you guys are very helpful I wasn't asking 'Am I in or out of IR35?'. I was asking 'Is this a good price?' Please stick to the question.Comment
-
Originally posted by garnet View Postit does help thanks.You got me thinking....
I just went to NW's site and used the IR35 checker. According to it I am out of IR35.
I am aware of IR35 although I am not an expert in it. And I dont need to be, as you said it takes someone who knows what they are doing. First thing this accountant asked me was 'Are you in or out of IR35?' I showed him the clauses of the contract and he agrees I am out. As does the NW's tool. I consider this safe enough, and still as you said, you never know until you have been to a tribunal.
While all you guys are very helpful I wasn't asking 'Am I in or out of IR35?'. I was asking 'Is this a good price?' Please stick to the question.
Answer is 'no'.The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
I give everything to HMRC. They take what is fair and give the rest to my accountant. The accountant then takes a fair fee and passes the rest on to me. I don't need to know the details, these are trustworthy people.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Today 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Yesterday 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
Comment