The way I tend to work is more akin to a freelancer at times... working on multiple contracts at the same time, sometimes with no fixed end date (when it's finished), etc. Listing everything on a CV will look odd I expect.
Is it dodgy to try and get a more straightforward chronological account by leaving off the overlapping work which is least relevant to contracts applied for? e.g if I want a C++ project and I worked 6 on both Java/C++ projects side-by-side the last 6 months, just list the C++ one?
I'm not aware you are in the wrong for NOT showing some work you did on a CV, rather than claiming stuff you never did, but is this true? Any CV like this will be 100% true after all. And it's not removing bad contracts either, simply trying to avoid confusing the agent/client.
Is it dodgy to try and get a more straightforward chronological account by leaving off the overlapping work which is least relevant to contracts applied for? e.g if I want a C++ project and I worked 6 on both Java/C++ projects side-by-side the last 6 months, just list the C++ one?
I'm not aware you are in the wrong for NOT showing some work you did on a CV, rather than claiming stuff you never did, but is this true? Any CV like this will be 100% true after all. And it's not removing bad contracts either, simply trying to avoid confusing the agent/client.
Comment