Originally posted by lje
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
IT Contractor initial contract
Collapse
X
-
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!! -
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostAgain more bollocks. There is no initial period for most. It is the standard rate and it never changes. Tech Mahindra is a classic example of this. Their rates are set at these ultra low levels whoever is doing the role and for however long directly replacing a role that last year was being done by other guys at a reasonable market rate.
And I say again, they can up their game as much as they wan't but it makes no difference to the fact the roles they are going for are getting filled by someone that does it for half the money. 'Upping their game' is probably going to make them loko even more qualified and less likely to get a roll that is out for 200 quid a day that was 300+ last year.
How often does quantity or cost matter to all of us in our daily lives when compared to quality? Some hiring managers don't want M&S/Waitrose, they will settle for Asda.
Capitalism in modern terms means everybody is looking after their own neck. A hiring manager will be at a firm for a year or two, in that time get a couple of payrises after reducing costs through using lower cost contractors, then be well away into a higher-ranking job, with minimal interest or contact with their previous employer/colleagues IF things are to go pear-shaped.
This is endemic, but also a cycle.
Once companies realise their short-term cost-cutting vision was a mistake, they will likely change and not repeat that mistake for a few years. Those companies that do not change are not likely to transition from a mediocre turnover company to a large investment-worthy opportunity.
You and I both know that cost-cutting will more often than not adversely affect projects, but we all do this in our daily lives, and as business is made up of people who do the same in their private life, they'll do it in their business life if it means they can feck off to a better position somewhere else in the not too distant future.
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostAt the end of the day I think the diffierence of opinion is base on wether you are directly affected by this. If you are not it and are happy to think you are safe then it is easy to play the 'do gooder' role and welcome with open arms. If you have seen your market drop from 300+ to 200 a day and the only roles out there mention Visa requirements then you are giong to be a little raw about it.
Don't keep all your eggs in one basket. If you have good learning capacity, and find the right reference materials, it's possible to learn up an entirely new technology (one not so prominent in India and that region of Asia, with reference to Tech Mahindra) that can get you hired, even if you haven't been lucky enough to use that technology before in a project.
I fully appreciate it can be irritating to see foreign workers come in to do a contract when you are sitting there, but in current times money is even more important, particulary for smaller businesses, meaning the guys and gals commanding higher rates are sidelined if they do not diversify enough. This applies to so many situations of industry change in the last fifty years that I have realised it's best not to dwell on it, and concentrate my utmost on getting the next permie or contract position.
There is no one singular cause of lack of employment, at the end of the day businesses want cheaper contractors, and are willing to risk mistakes, as it saves them a lot of money. Many businesses are toe-ing the fine between operation and failure, with some people on seemingly permanent redundancy consultation.Last edited by larson; 25 February 2010, 13:30.Comment
-
Originally posted by Mailman_1 View PostBoo f**king Hoo. Getting bored of people moaning about "These people coming over here" etc etc. A bit of competition never hurt anyone. If your any good at your job, you shouldnt have any problems.
Must admit, Im getting bored of people trotting out this 'if you're good enough, you shouldnt have anything to worry about' view. Its turning a blind eye to reality.
But you carry on. Perhaps when you're being massively undercut, you may wonder why there's no one about to listen to you.I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!Comment
-
Originally posted by The Agents View View PostHaving watched it, I wouldn't employ an english person for work a polish guy could do better, faster, with more passion, and for half the cost. Honestly - these people think the world owes them a living.
I really don't understand unemployed people - if you're unemployed, go and do a supermarket job, go and do a temp job, go and do SOMETHING. 4 million unemployed, and 5 million open vacancies in the UK - given that the majority of you berate agencies so much, maybe you should set up and show us how it's done??
Also, most people in this forum didn't study and work for so many years to go do checkouts at a supermarket. That is for unskilled labour. There's an argument for those unemployed people to diversify, and if necessary take on a low end tech job in a technical position they are technically unfamiliar with; but do you think an HR person is going to give a high-tech person a low-tech permanent role knowing full well they'll be off as soon as a better offer comes along?
I'm much younger than the core demographic of this forum and there's naff all chance I'd take a supermarket job whilst unemployed. I have self-respect, and self-value to know what I'm worth, even in a depressed market. The problem with applying for basic tech jobs is that they are often advertised as permanent, and those jobs that you can DIY (computer repair etc) are already been offered by people at very low rates. ie: £5/hour) already.
"Easier said than done" springs to mind.Comment
-
Originally posted by larson View PostI'm much younger than the core demographic of this forum and there's naff all chance I'd take a supermarket job whilst unemployed. I have self-respect, and self-value to know what I'm worth, even in a depressed market.
If I had no contract and bills to pay I would quite happily stack shelves at a supermarket or work on a bar, it is what you do to survive and I would much rather do that than sit at home getting hand outs from the government. Unfortunately it seems that people like me are a rare breed these days, most will happily sit on benefits whining that there is no job for them and expecting somebody to stump up a well paid job where they will tend to do the bare minimum to get paid.Comment
-
Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostThat's a very naive opinion you have there.
Must admit, Im getting bored of people trotting out this 'if you're good enough, you shouldnt have anything to worry about' view. Its turning a blind eye to reality.
But you carry on. Perhaps when you're being massively undercut, you may wonder why there's no one about to listen to you.Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostWhat a load of bulltulip. Someone coming over and doing a job for half the money the market is asking for is hardly competition idiot.Comment
-
Originally posted by larson View PostI didn't see the programme you mention, but the fact some Polish people may do an extremely good job for lesser money, coupled with the fact that some English (you meant UK resident though I presume) workers in the same business as the Polish person may do a sh!t job, does not therefore mean ignoring the English counterpart in favour of any Polish person based on a few extreme examples.
Also, most people in this forum didn't study and work for so many years to go do checkouts at a supermarket. That is for unskilled labour. There's an argument for those unemployed people to diversify, and if necessary take on a low end tech job in a technical position they are technically unfamiliar with; but do you think an HR person is going to give a high-tech person a low-tech permanent role knowing full well they'll be off as soon as a better offer comes along?
I'm much younger than the core demographic of this forum and there's naff all chance I'd take a supermarket job whilst unemployed. I have self-respect, and self-value to know what I'm worth, even in a depressed market. The problem with applying for basic tech jobs is that they are often advertised as permanent, and those jobs that you can DIY (computer repair etc) are already been offered by people at very low rates. ie: £5/hour) already.
"Easier said than done" springs to mind.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Sounds more like Stavros than Bob.
I was jes sitting down with Her-Inside-Of-The-Doors to watch Corporation Street on the telly and all of a suddenness there's a bloke at the door talking a lot of old cobblestones.Comment
-
Originally posted by Ardesco View Post
If I had no contract and bills to pay I would quite happily stack shelves at a supermarket or work on a bar, it is what you do to survive and I would much rather do that than sit at home getting hand outs from the government.
Also the benefits system works to screw people who are childless who work part-time or on low wages. So it's a balancing act depending on your out goings whether you should go on the dole or not.
Originally posted by Ardesco View PostUnfortunately it seems that people like me are a rare breed these days, most will happily sit on benefits whining that there is no job for them and expecting somebody to stump up a well paid job where they will tend to do the bare minimum to get paid.
I also related to someone who got his first proper job by doing work that was "beneath" him.
If you sit at home hiding in your bedroom or garage like some of the guys in their 20s on the program, then you are missing out on one aspect of networking so it doesn't help you on your quest to find proper work."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Today 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Yesterday 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Yesterday 05:45
- Payment request to bust recruitment agency — free template Sep 16 21:04
- Why licensing umbrella companies must be key to 2027’s regulation Sep 16 13:55
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 15 03:46
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 14 15:46
- What the housing market needs at Autumn Budget 2025 Sep 10 20:58
- Qdos hit by cybersecurity ‘attack’ Sep 10 01:01
- Why party conference season 2025 is a self-employment policy litmus test Sep 9 09:53
Comment