Originally posted by jmo21
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Fustration in investment banking
Collapse
X
-
-
WHSOriginally posted by herman_g View PostThe attitude in the market by employers today is appalling.
F' em all. As they reject more and more candidates, the price just seems to go higher until they find that "special" candidate for the job.+50 Xeno Geek Points
Come back Toolpusher, scotspine, Voodooflux.Pogle
As for the rest of you - DILLIGAF
Purveyor of fine quality smut since 2005
CUK Olympic University Challenge Champions 2010/2012
Comment
-
I once walked from an interview when they announced that they were planning a days worth of interview 'tasks' from 9 am to 5 pm for a panel of interviewees.
In fact, one by one we all got up and just marched out.
It really is too stupid to contemplate why anyone would need to go through this.
Summat else will turn up with half the stress levels and you'll be glad you didn't get it.Comment
-
Re: getting rejected because you corrected their technical misunderstanding - when I have been the interviewer and the interviewee has pointed out a mistake, I definitely put that as a plus point.
I remember asking a few detailed questions and code snippets about java threading, which this one candidate passed fine but then added "of course, you'd never do it this way now because of all new concurrent package."Comment
-
The problem was he was alleging I didn't know my onions, because of his less than 100% knowledge of the technology (I would give him that the other 90% was very good). So I think I had to correct him slightly.Originally posted by bobhope View PostRe: getting rejected because you corrected their technical misunderstanding - when I have been the interviewer and the interviewee has pointed out a mistake, I definitely put that as a plus point.
I remember asking a few detailed questions and code snippets about java threading, which this one candidate passed fine but then added "of course, you'd never do it this way now because of all new concurrent package."
Problem with IB is that they do tend to interview at least twice for a job, but then renumeration is better than outside the industry. My rate reflects significant IB knowledge.
I try to see technical interviews that I don't get the job as training (where I don't know something). Fustration being when one has done their homework.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment